Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Sodomite high school in Chicago?

A sodomite high school coming to a neighborhood near you. That's right, according to OneNewsNow.com, "A battleground is forming in Chicago over a proposed "gay" (editor's note, sodomite)-friendly high school for homosexual, lesbian, and transgendered students, or any other students who want to attend. According to reports, taxpayer money would be used to fund the school.

One News Now.com continues, "The school would be called the Pride Campus of Social Justice High School, and plans are under way to possibly open its doors in 2010. Advocates of the school say it is needed in order to combat the bullying, dropout, and depression rate among homosexual students. The Chicago Sun-Times quotes a member of the school's design team who says students at the school would be taught about "gay and lesbian historical figures" so those students "have heroes." Editors' note. Unfortunately, sodomites anymore claim many historical figures were "gay" in order to justify their sick and perverse lifestyle. For example, they will make absurd claims that Abraham Lincoln, Alexander the Great, and former F.B.I Director Hoover

One News Now.com continues, "Laurie Higgins and her group, the Illinois Family Institute, are at the forefront of the fray. "A high school that is dedicated to or centrally focused on homosexuality necessarily requires that public educators have come to some prior conclusions about the nature and morality of homosexuality," she points out. Those are aspects of homosexuality that she says stand "far outside the purview of public educators." (hear audio report) Pro-family advocate Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth About Homosexuality [Caution: This website contains graphic images] takes issue with the fact that the school would be run on taxpayer monies. "The taxpayers -- whether they're Christians, Orthodox Jews, Muslims -- they will be funding [this] pro-homosexual indoctrination school for so-called 'gay' youth," he explains. Higgins agrees that public funding for the school would be inappropriate (and clearly Unconstitutional). And as for the rationale for the school being needed to combat bullying of homosexual students, she believes rules of conduct should be established and enforced on an equal basis. "The task is to combat harassment and abuse and bullying, while not affirming disordered thinking and immoral behavior," she explains. And while she acknowledges that some homosexual students are bullied, Higgins' experience in public education reveals another group that she feels suffers more. "I can say with assurance that the kids who are very conservative Christians are probably the ones who are the most ridiculed or made fun of," (and of course, white Christians who stands up for their white culture and heritage) she states. Chicago Public Schools is soliciting public input for a vote. LaBarbera and Higgins both encourage concerned Chicago parents to petition that the school not be allowed to open." Of course, maybe it wouldn't be a bad idea to have sodomites not being in the same classes with straight students. Until then.

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

LaRaza requesting Sheriff Steve Bizzell to resign.

LaRaza, the racist Mexican organization is requesting that Johnston County Sheriff Steve Bizzell of North Carolina resign because of statements about Mexicans. In a recent article in Raleigh's The News & Observer, Johnston County Sheriff Steve Bizzell was quoted accusing Latinos of "breeding like rabbits," calling Mexicans "trashy," and stating, "When people think about illegal Mexicans, you know the first thing they think of? Driving drunk and shooting. Sheriff Bizzell is saying what many Americans are saying out of frustration. Time and time again, Americans are angry and fed up that our elected leaders are not doing anything, especially our President. President Bush should be sending troops to our borders in order to protect our country and citizens. We have an invasion that literally thousands are crossing our borders a day, and our so called elected officials just look the other way because they don't want to offend Mexicans or other so called minority groups because then they would be called racists and bigots. There are however, people in this country such as Sheriff Bizzell that obviously is just tired of Mexicans getting off scott free and not being rounded up and sent back to their countries. Now as a result, a coalition of minority extremist groups in North Carolina has asked that the Johnston County commissioners push for Bizzell's resignation. Now, if a black sheriff or a Mexican sheriff had made statements that were anti-white, would there be an outcry by these same people requesting and demanding that particular sheriff resign. Of course not. Fortunately, however, what they fail to realize is a sheriff position is an elected official. In fact, it is really the only legal law enforcement official since the people vote for their sheriff. He is not appointed by a mayor or some other official. Therefore, I pray that Sheriff Bizzell will stand firm, and not cave into the non-white extremists. Until then.

Saturday, October 4, 2008

Giving loans to non-whites caused financial crisis.

It has just been reported that the federal government has just signed a bill for 700 billion dollars to bail out lenders such as Fannie Mae. Most Americans are upset that this has happened and in fact, majority of the callers to the Capitol switchboard was against bailing out these lenders that are controlled by Jewish Supremacists CEOs. But the real question is why are we in this mess in the first place? The easy answer is that the we have an unconstitional banking system that is dictating our money policy, which is called the Federal Reserve. The Constitional specifically states that U.S. Congress is to control and regulate our financial policy and to print and regulate our money. However, the Federal Reserve, a private bank now prints and loans money out to the United States, in which we then have to pay back with interest. But to the question at hand, why are these financial lenders collapsing? The media will not shed light on the answer, and the political leaders will not discuss it, but the reason these lenders are collapsing is that Fannie Mae ( the headquarters is on the right), just to name one, announced back in 1999 that they were changing their policy and ease the credit requirements on loans which would increase home ownership rates among minorities. Steven A. Holmes, published an article in the Wall Street Jounal, which he stated, "The action, which will begin as a pilot program involving 24 banks in 15 markets -- including the New York metropolitan region -- will encourage those banks to extend home mortgages to individuals whose credit is generally not good enough to qualify for conventional loans. Fannie Mae officials say they hope to make it a nationwide program by next spring. Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits." (you also can go to wickipedia.com and they acknowledge this as well). "In addition, banks, thrift institutions and mortgage companies have been pressing Fannie Mae to help them make more loans to so-called subprime borrowers. These borrowers whose incomes, credit ratings and savings are not good enough to qualify for conventional loans, can only get loans from finance companies that charge much higher interest rates -- anywhere from three to four percentage points higher than conventional loans." Holmes went on to say that one study indicates that "18 percent of the loans in the subprime market went to black borrowers, compared to 5 per cent of loans in the conventional loan market." Now that obviously is not too much of a problem during any economic boom, but may "run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in the 1980's," said Holmes. He goes on to say that "Fannie Mae officials stress that the new mortgages will be extended to all potential borrowers who can qualify for a mortgage. But they add that the move is intended in part to increase the number of minority and low income home owners who tend to have worse credit ratings than non-Hispanic whites." As a result, hispanic applicants jumped by 87.2 per cent from 1993 to 1998, and blacks, who got mortgages increased by 71.9 percent. In July of 1999, the Department of Housing and Urban Development proposed that by the year 2001, 50 percent of Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's portfolio be made up of loans to low and moderate-income borrowers. Last year, 44 percent of the loans Fannie Mae purchased were from these groups. And of course, another main reason there is such a push to obviously, the blame game. Back in 1999, the policy change came when HUD began investigating allegations of so called "racial discrimination" in the automated underwriting systems used by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to determine the credit-worthiness of credit applicants. To read the complete article by Holmes, click below. But there you have it, now it's 2008, and we are in the financial crisis that we are in, in part, because of the reckless and irrisponsible actions of these lenders that basically was another "give away" program to non-whites. Until then.