Wednesday, December 31, 2008

U.S. Federal Government continues to import foreign workers despite Americans losing jobs

Well folks, this is the last day of the 2008, and I hope that you all will have a successfull New Year. With that being said, the future years to do not appear bright when we see the quick change our beloved country is going through such as sodomite rights, millions of illegal aliens flooding into our borders, legal aliens being allowed at a number rate from non-white countries, Christianity being destroyed through the false teachings of Judeo-Christianity, the continual destruction of state rights,etc. However, we as White Nationalists have a duty to continue to sound the alarm to our White brothers and sisters of the betrayal of our elected leaders. We have to continue to be involved politically such as being involved in our local politics, passing out literature, and supporting White Nationalist organizations. With the new Obama administration, we unfornately will see a change that will continue this destruction. Now, by all means, don't think the Republican leadership is any better. They have been betraying the White American citizens just as much as the Democrats. One example is the continual policy of allowing Foreign Workers coming into our country while American at the same time our losing their jobs. 533,000 Jobs were Lost in NOV -- But the Feds Imported Another 140,000 Foreign Workers the Same Month! Accoring to Roy Beck, of NumbersUSA, the federal government is reporting another giant loss of jobs for November, "Non-farm employers in the U.S. eliminated 533,000 jobs in November. At the same time, in a typical month the feds give out approximately 140,000 new work permits and green cards to foreign workers. How can this make any sense for the American people's own government to be recruiting more competitors for a dwindling number of jobs? Month after month as hundreds of thousands of Americans lose their jobs, the feds keep pumping another 140,000 new foreign workers into the laborforce. The new foreign workers compete with the laid-off and underemployed highly skilled Americans in most professions and occupations, but most foreign workers compete directly in the construction, service and manufacturing industries where unemployment is the highest and where Americans have the least margin of financial security.
The feds add workers in two major ways.
The most recent government data show that the feds granted greencards to 744,531 new working-age permanent immigrants (age 20-64) in 2007. Every one of them can immediately apply for a job (as can many more immigrants who are below and above that age range).
The Department of Homeland Security reports that in the fiscal year just ended it issued NEW work permits to another 912,735 foreign workers who are not permanent immigrants.
That adds up to an astounding rate of 1,657,266 foreign workers per year, and that doesn't count renewals on foreign work permits or the flow of illegal workers."

Monday, December 29, 2008

Canada repealing "hate speech" provision?

The Canadian Conservative Party has overwhelmingly approved a resolution to repeal the "hate speech" provision that has been used to trample on the free speech rights of Christians, White Nationalists, and others who speak out against homosexuality and other groups that undermining Canadian culture and heritage. At its recent convention in Winnipeg, the Conservative Party approved Resolution P-203, which would repeal Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, the "hate speech" provision. According to OneNewsNow.com, "Brian Rushfeldt, the executive director of the Canada Family Action Coalition, says repeal of Section 13 is long overdue. "Section 13 is the one that allows, basically, Human Rights Commission people to persecute somebody for freedom of speech on an issue that the commission feels is either promoting hate or causing discrimination against a particular individual," he explains. But Rushfeldt believes it will be up to the people to push for the repeal of Section 13. "I think the people of Canada are going to drive it [at] the next election if there hasn't been action taken before that to fix the Human Rights Act," he contends. "I think the people of Canada are going to make this an election issue, and I believe that the Conservative Party is the only one that would even consider changing the Human Rights Act." There is little chance, Rushfeldt says, that Section 13 can be repealed with the current makeup of Parliament." However, White Nationalist Paul Fromm, the director of Canadians for Free Expression (CAFE), http://www.canadianfreespeech.com/, which is an organization that has been in the fore front of free rights and expression in Canada has been sounding the alarm of such laws in Canada since 1981. On a side note, Paul Fromm will be speaking at the Faith and Freedom Conference at the Soldiers of the Cross Bible Camp near Harrison, Arkansas, which will be held on April 4,5 and 6 (Friday, Saturday, and Sunday), to to http://www.tarobb.blogspot.com/ for future reference on this conference. Now, few Christians believed the law would be used against them by homosexuals. But it has done just that. Homosexuals now just have to claim that Christians are promoting hate and causing discrimination against them whenever the Christians preach that homosexuality is a sin from the Bible. If the commission feels that this is occuring, an individual can actually be criminally charged for violating Section 13. And don't think that this is not happening in America. It is, but it is just a slower process. With criminal statutes that enhances crimes because of race, such as "hate crime laws," laws preventing an individual to run their business as they see fit, such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964, these are all small steps to ultimately to take rights from individuals (the people) and place it slowly to the government. Until then.

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

Christmas-bashing atheist sign in Washington Capitol

The state of Washington's governor is permitting display of a Christmas-bashing atheist sign. As Liberty Counsel's Mat Staver explains, the holiday display in the state Capitol includes a Christmas tree, nativity scene, menorah. "Next to those three symbols is a rant by the Freedom From Religion Foundation, purportedly to celebrate the Winter Solstice -- but it doesn't do anything of the kind," says the Christian attorney. "It's a rant against the existence of God. It claims that there is no god, [that] there are no angels or devils or heaven or hell, and that reason should prevail." Governor Chris Gregoire does not have to permit the atheist sign because it must meet the theme of the display, which it does not, says Staver. The sign, he says, is totally out of place because the other three items are symbols -- not attacks on other religions and their holidays. "It's absolutely outrageous that this sign is there," Staver asserts, "and we ought to call on the governor to remove this travesty." The governor said she has no choice but to allow the sign -- a stance Liberty Counsel labels as "erroneous." The first problem however, is that the nativity scene is next to the menorah. The Menorah (the symbol of Judaism) is not Christian and in fact Judaism specifically teaches that Jesus was born from a whore and that he would live eternally in urine. There is a deep hatred of Jesus. You would have never scene that togather 40 to 50 years ago when our country was still a Christian nation. America used to be a Christian nation, but now we only live in the memories of a Christian nation. Not only was our founding fathers Christians, but the citizens were Christians and this was reflected in our laws, both national and state. Our governmental documents reflected it, and even our Supreme Court at least twice opined that our America was a Christian country. But with the our elected leaders now moved away from Christianity, our judges and other government officials no longer recognize this. Is it a wonder why we are now having displays of this anti-Christian bashing on our state's capitol? Duh... Until then.

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

Obama keeping homosexual promises

According to OneNewsNow.com, "President-elect Barack Obama is moving swiftly to appoint homosexual activists to positions within his administration. Politico.com reports that 10 national homosexual organizations are working with the Obama transition team to get more openly homosexual people appointed to the incoming administration. Obama's transition team has also reportedly named at least seven openly homosexual people to transition panels assigned to review federal departments and agencies. Three of the seven homosexuals on transition panels have held high-level positions in the Clinton administration. Matt Barber, director of cultural affairs with Liberty Counsel and Liberty Alliance Action, says Obama is keeping his promises to the homosexual lobby.
"Obama, throughout the campaign, signaled...very quietly, but nonetheless signaled on his web page and elsewhere that he essentially had signed off on every major demand of homosexual pressure groups," he said. "So it's not surprising that he has now allowed some of these radical activists to become part of his administration." Now, if you go to www.change.gov, President-Elect Barack Obama's website, he deals specifically with so-called homosexual rights. In bold print, it states: Support for the LGBT Community
"While we have come a long way since the Stonewall riots in 1969, we still have a lot of work to do. Too often, the issue of LGBT rights is exploited by those seeking to divide us. But at its core, this issue is about who we are as Americans. It's about whether this nation is going to live up to its founding promise of equality by treating all its citizens with dignity and respect." I guess the picture on the right is the new America Barack Obama is talking about. Until then.

Sunday, November 30, 2008

Amnesty will be coming soon


America has opened its gates to non-white immigration since the 60's and since that time, America has changed to a white European country of 90% in the 60s to just around 60 % (just in 30-40 years). As a result, we see a country that no longer reflects a love of their white culture, heritage and people. But a country that is bent on destroying the memories of our beloved white European country and turning it to a country that looks like a typical third world country. And it appears that our country will even now be moving faster to a non-white country. Senate Majority Leader Reid told the Detroit Free Press that President-elect Obama and Senator McCain have already agreed on an amnesty bill and that Leader Reid will champion it in the coming months. Furthermore, Reid said he expects little resistance to a comprehensive amnesty bill from the public. Now many people got behind McAmnesty (McCain) because they thought he would be tougher on illigal immigration because the last fiasco when American stool up and said no to the extensive immigration bill (which was just another amnesty) that the Washington politicans tried to stuff down our throats. However, it seems that McAmnesty and the other neo-cons and Marxist liberals will once again going to try to turn millions of illegal aliens to "citizens" just overninght. Unfortunately, it appears this time they will most likely succeed because of the overwhelming new Democrats in the Sentate, House, and recently President-Elect Obama.
Here is an excerpt from the Detroit Free Press interview.
Q: With more Democrats in the Senate and the House and a Democrat in the White House, how do you see congressional efforts playing out on such issues as health care and immigration?A: On immigration, there's been an agreement between (President-elect Barack) Obama and (Arizona Republican Sen. John) McCain to move forward on that. ... We'll do that. We have to get this economy stuff figured out first, so I think we'll have a shot at doing something on health care in the next Congress for sure.

Q: Will there be as much of a fight on immigration as last time?


A: We've got McCain and we've got a few others. I don't expect much of a fight at all. Now health care is going to be difficult. That's a very complicated issue. We debated at great length immigration. People understand the issues very well. We have not debated health care, so that's going to take a lot more time to do.

Sunday, November 23, 2008

Campus evangelism a crime?

The so-called "free-speech code" of Yuba Community College District is under federal court scrutiny. According to OneNewsNow.com, A California student, Ryan Dozier, decided to spend some time on campus sharing his faith and handing out tracts to fellow students, generating conversations about Christianity. Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) attorney Heather Hacker comments on the situation. "A campus police officer came over and told him that if he continued to do so without a permit that he would be possibly expelled or arrested, and so Ryan stopped immediately," she explains. Hacker says Dozier thought the case was closed, but he was apparently mistaken. "Three weeks later he got a certified letter from the president of the college stating that his actions were the subject of a campus crime report," she adds. "Last time I checked, sharing your faith on a public college campus was not a crime." But the letter informed him he could face expulsion if he shared his faith on campus again. ADF filed suit, and a federal judge has ordered the college to suspend enforcement of its highly restricted free speech policies until the lawsuit is resolved. Now, if a college had done this to a homosexual or non-white "activist", no doubt would you be hearing this on all of your cable news. However, since this was done to a Christian activists, not a word. We are living in a world and in a generation where our Christian values and faith are being attacked on all fronts. The liberal left wing hippies of the 60's and 70's are now the presidents of many of our national colleges, and they will stop at nothing to continue to push their Marxist agenda; even threatening criminal actions against Christians. It's communism all over again. Until then.

Sunday, November 16, 2008

Kindergartners given homosexual 'pledge cards'

Christian parents more than ever have to be on guard when sending their children to public school. What they don't understand is that as the public schools become more and more tolerant with anti-Christian beliefs, such as homosexuals and (already miscegenation) teachers that you expect will be teaching your children the a,b,c's will be teaching your little boy or girl that marrying and dating the person of the same sex is o.k. Now of course, all teachers don't believe this, but there is a growing amount of teachers that do. Here is one example, in California, a public school teacher passed out a pledge cards that were produced by the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network, or GLSEN, and featured oaths that students would not use "anti-lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender language or slurs," that students would intervene on behalf of homosexual students when possible, and that they would actively support safer schools efforts. And of course, just being a Christian that says I"m against homosexuality and that you believe homosexuality is an abomination would be considered "hate speech and slurs. Tara Miller is a kindergarten teacher at Faith Ringgold School of Arts and Science in Hayward, California. She passed out the pledge cards to her students, which she then asked them to sign. Peter LaBarbera, the president of Americans for Truth about Homosexuality, is outraged at Miller's actions. "First of all, why is homosexuality as an issue being raised at all in kindergarten? These are students who don't even know what sex is yet, and this teacher is talking to them about homosexuality," he contends. "This is an abuse of these students' minds, and it's just wrong."
According to a report on FoxNews.com, one parent was angry when she found her child's signature on the pledge card. LaBarbera believes this instance highlights the real agenda of the homosexual movement. "This is just bizarre, and it shows how the teachers with their radical sexual agenda want to start early to reprogram these kids' minds. They want to undermine the faith teachings that the kids have at home; this is part of a plan," he suggests. In the same report on FoxNews.com, a spokesperson for the school agreed that the pledge was inappropriate for the kindergarten students and said that the pledges were meant for middle school and high school students.
Now, what would have happened, if a Christian teacher or one that was a White Nationalists would hand out a pledge card saying that you would not tolerate or allow other students make slurs or make comments that were anti-Christian or anti-White. That teacher would have been fired on the spot, and would have been on the news nationwide. The teacher would have probably been stripped of her teaching degree, and the school probably would have been sued. Ladies and Gentleman, your children are at a high risk when they attend public schools. If they are in public school, be on guard. Watch out. Be involved. If you can, homeschool your chilren. Your children's future is too important. Until then.

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

President-Elect Obama seeks "spiritual" guidance from openly homosexual bishop

As I've been reporting lately, President-elect Barack Obama is definitely going to bring change to this country, but it will be a change that we won't recognize. One of those changes is Barack Obama's strong belief that sodomites should have equal rights in our government, schools, and even churches. There is no doubt that Obama will be pushing for a "new" civil rights legislation that will prevent discrimation based upon sexual orientation, which means you wouldn't be able to discriminate against homosexuals. If you didn't want to sell your home to a homosexual, you would be in violation of federal law. If a local Christian school or church didn't want to hire a Sunday school teacher because she was a lesbian, then that church or school would be in violation of federal law and would be sued. See, the implication is far reaching. Now some may say that this is an exageration. Well, they did this with the 1964 Civil Rights law that outlawed discrimination based upon race. Now, it's the homosexuals turn up to the plate. The Times of London reports that Barack Obama sought out New Hampshire homosexual bishop Vicki Gene Robinson for advice three times during his presidential campaign. Robinson, whose ordination in the Episcopal Church has caused a deep rift within the Anglican Communion, was reportedly sought out by Obama to discuss what it feels like to be "first." Robinson notes in their three private conversations, Obama voiced his support for "equal civil rights" for homosexuals and described the election as a "religious experience." Peter LaBarbera, president of Americans for Truth About Homosexuality, believes "Obama's consultations with Robinson show the true tenor of his upcoming administration. "It looks like Billy Graham has been replaced by a gay bishop. We're moving to, perhaps, our first anti-Christian president; it's beyond post-Christian. Gene Robinson advocates homosexuality as part of the Christian experience," he explains. "Now Bible-believing Christians cannot accept that. Homosexual practice is sinful, as taught by the scriptures. This man [Obama] pretends to be faithful to Christianity, even as he works very hard to undermine it." LaBarbera suggests Robinson may possibly replace Jeremiah Wright as one of Obama's main spiritual advisers. Wright was Obama's Chicago pastor for 20 years before disassociating with the controversial preacher during the presidential campaign." Change is coming, so hold on. Until then.

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Cross-dressers in White House with Obama?

A change is coming to America, and it is a scary one. What will the White House look like under an Obama administration? Well, it may look similar to that of San Francisco during the annual Sodomite parade. According to OneNewsNow.com, there is alarm over president-elect Barack Obama's plan to expand a Clinton-era executive order that provides special protections for federal employees based on their sexual behavior. "The Obama-Biden transition team has included both "sexual orientation" and "gender identity" in its non-discrimination policy for applicants for employment in the incoming Obama administration." Apparently, as the two homosexuals depict to the right, you may see a scene similar to this when you take your chilren to the White House or U.S. Capitol. Or perhaps, you may see Vice-President elect Joe Biden pushing Barack Obama in a shopping cart at the White House on your next tour since they are pushing this agenda so much (umm, I wonder why). Anyway, President Bush, trying to appease the Sodomite crowd did not overturn Bill Clinton's executive order prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. Yet, the Clinton order does not address so-called gender identity. Word of Obama's planned executive order has excited his allies on the left. Christopher Anders, senior legislative counsel with the American Civil Liberties Union, says "president-elect Obama and vice president-elect Biden, by explicitly rejecting the bigotry and intolerance of the past, are committing that gay, lesbian, and transgender professionals can serve in government without fear of discrimination." Peter LaBarbera, president of Americans for Truth About Homosexuality, says Obama's new non-discrimination policy will be an "open door" for gender-confused and cross-dressing federal employees. "What's the Obama administration going to do to protect women in federal restrooms?" the activist asks. "Since men [wearing] dresses apparently are going to be protected under gender-identity provisions, what about the women in the restrooms in the White House and other federal buildings? What's going to be done to protect their rights?" LaBarbera even wonders if there is going to have to be a new federal outlay for the building of new "gender-free, transgender restrooms." The president-elect has been a supporter of a version of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) that offers special protections for transgender employees. All of this is an attempt to further the so called civil-rights protections of Sodomites, and eventually lead to legislation that specifically protects homosexuals, and prohibits discrimination based on being a homosexual or "gender confused." Unfortantely, millions of whites voted for Barack Obama without realizing that the change they voted for is not going to be in the best interest of our dearly beloved America, or their children. A change is coming, and perhaps it's Obama wearing a dress. Until then.

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

Marxist Obama becomes First Black President

Today, I'm in mourning. To wake up and realize that we have elected not only the first black President, but a Marxist President saddens my heart. For the majority of White Americans, we truly, perhaps, won't feel the true effect. But our children will feel the pain and burden that we as a country have given them. That being said, these so called Christians, what we would called Judeo Christians, such as Focus on on the Family, American Family Association,and others that have abandoned the traditional Christian values and beliefs in that they have supported millions of non-white immigration into our country, and race-mixing, which have caused our country to become almost non-white. And we see today what that has done. We have just now witnessed a virtual race war in that vast majority of the non-whites have voted overwhelmingly for Barack Obama and the whites voted for Insane McCain. The reward for the betrayal of our people is Marxist Obama. May God have mercy upon our nation. Until then.

Monday, November 3, 2008

Tomorrow is the Big Day.

There is no doubt that tomorrow will be an election that will see significant change for our country. Either way, White Christians will lose. Either we will have for the first time a black President that does not share thebeliefs of our founding forefathers or we will have a white McAmnesty that will help ensure that millions of illegal aliens will become citizens that will only bring a quicker destruction to our country. But we will most likely see a quicker left wing, socialist, marxist agenda with a President Obama. For example, President Obama could overturn marriage amendment. According to OneNewsNow.com, a 'President Obama' could overturn marriage amendments California, Arizona, and Florida have constitutional amendments on the ballot to ban homosexual "marriage." Liberty Counsel examines the Florida amendment as well as the repercussions of the federal election. Mat Staver of Liberty Counsel tells OneNewsNow the stakes are high in Florida because passage of a constitutional amendment requires 60 percent of the vote. "Right now the polls show about 57 percent in favor of the amendment. The good news is only 34 percent oppose the amendment," he explains. "There is an undecided factor in there. I believe that factor will swing for us when they go to the polls." However, he also points out the national election could affect all states in terms of homosexual marriage. If elected president, Barack Obama has promised to repeal the federal Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, which currently means states cannot be forced to recognize homosexual marriages that are legal in other states. "Now if that happens, that will be like removing the dam and same-sex marriage will flood across the country, notwithstanding the fact that a state even has a constitutional amendment," he contends. "A state will be required to recognize either Massachusetts or California or some other state's same-sex marriage law. That means same-sex marriage will literally rush across the borders of all 50 states." We our losing our country at such an alarming rate, and the alarming thing is how quickly it has occurred. We as Christians need to remember that our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ is in complete control. We have to be steadfast and remain faithful and be witnesses to our White brothers and sisters and proclaim the message of White Christian Revival. Until then.

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Sodomite high school in Chicago?

A sodomite high school coming to a neighborhood near you. That's right, according to OneNewsNow.com, "A battleground is forming in Chicago over a proposed "gay" (editor's note, sodomite)-friendly high school for homosexual, lesbian, and transgendered students, or any other students who want to attend. According to reports, taxpayer money would be used to fund the school.

One News Now.com continues, "The school would be called the Pride Campus of Social Justice High School, and plans are under way to possibly open its doors in 2010. Advocates of the school say it is needed in order to combat the bullying, dropout, and depression rate among homosexual students. The Chicago Sun-Times quotes a member of the school's design team who says students at the school would be taught about "gay and lesbian historical figures" so those students "have heroes." Editors' note. Unfortunately, sodomites anymore claim many historical figures were "gay" in order to justify their sick and perverse lifestyle. For example, they will make absurd claims that Abraham Lincoln, Alexander the Great, and former F.B.I Director Hoover



One News Now.com continues, "Laurie Higgins and her group, the Illinois Family Institute, are at the forefront of the fray. "A high school that is dedicated to or centrally focused on homosexuality necessarily requires that public educators have come to some prior conclusions about the nature and morality of homosexuality," she points out. Those are aspects of homosexuality that she says stand "far outside the purview of public educators." (hear audio report) Pro-family advocate Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth About Homosexuality [Caution: This website contains graphic images] takes issue with the fact that the school would be run on taxpayer monies. "The taxpayers -- whether they're Christians, Orthodox Jews, Muslims -- they will be funding [this] pro-homosexual indoctrination school for so-called 'gay' youth," he explains. Higgins agrees that public funding for the school would be inappropriate (and clearly Unconstitutional). And as for the rationale for the school being needed to combat bullying of homosexual students, she believes rules of conduct should be established and enforced on an equal basis. "The task is to combat harassment and abuse and bullying, while not affirming disordered thinking and immoral behavior," she explains. And while she acknowledges that some homosexual students are bullied, Higgins' experience in public education reveals another group that she feels suffers more. "I can say with assurance that the kids who are very conservative Christians are probably the ones who are the most ridiculed or made fun of," (and of course, white Christians who stands up for their white culture and heritage) she states. Chicago Public Schools is soliciting public input for a vote. LaBarbera and Higgins both encourage concerned Chicago parents to petition that the school not be allowed to open." Of course, maybe it wouldn't be a bad idea to have sodomites not being in the same classes with straight students. Until then.

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

LaRaza requesting Sheriff Steve Bizzell to resign.

LaRaza, the racist Mexican organization is requesting that Johnston County Sheriff Steve Bizzell of North Carolina resign because of statements about Mexicans. In a recent article in Raleigh's The News & Observer, Johnston County Sheriff Steve Bizzell was quoted accusing Latinos of "breeding like rabbits," calling Mexicans "trashy," and stating, "When people think about illegal Mexicans, you know the first thing they think of? Driving drunk and shooting. Sheriff Bizzell is saying what many Americans are saying out of frustration. Time and time again, Americans are angry and fed up that our elected leaders are not doing anything, especially our President. President Bush should be sending troops to our borders in order to protect our country and citizens. We have an invasion that literally thousands are crossing our borders a day, and our so called elected officials just look the other way because they don't want to offend Mexicans or other so called minority groups because then they would be called racists and bigots. There are however, people in this country such as Sheriff Bizzell that obviously is just tired of Mexicans getting off scott free and not being rounded up and sent back to their countries. Now as a result, a coalition of minority extremist groups in North Carolina has asked that the Johnston County commissioners push for Bizzell's resignation. Now, if a black sheriff or a Mexican sheriff had made statements that were anti-white, would there be an outcry by these same people requesting and demanding that particular sheriff resign. Of course not. Fortunately, however, what they fail to realize is a sheriff position is an elected official. In fact, it is really the only legal law enforcement official since the people vote for their sheriff. He is not appointed by a mayor or some other official. Therefore, I pray that Sheriff Bizzell will stand firm, and not cave into the non-white extremists. Until then.

Saturday, October 4, 2008

Giving loans to non-whites caused financial crisis.

It has just been reported that the federal government has just signed a bill for 700 billion dollars to bail out lenders such as Fannie Mae. Most Americans are upset that this has happened and in fact, majority of the callers to the Capitol switchboard was against bailing out these lenders that are controlled by Jewish Supremacists CEOs. But the real question is why are we in this mess in the first place? The easy answer is that the we have an unconstitional banking system that is dictating our money policy, which is called the Federal Reserve. The Constitional specifically states that U.S. Congress is to control and regulate our financial policy and to print and regulate our money. However, the Federal Reserve, a private bank now prints and loans money out to the United States, in which we then have to pay back with interest. But to the question at hand, why are these financial lenders collapsing? The media will not shed light on the answer, and the political leaders will not discuss it, but the reason these lenders are collapsing is that Fannie Mae ( the headquarters is on the right), just to name one, announced back in 1999 that they were changing their policy and ease the credit requirements on loans which would increase home ownership rates among minorities. Steven A. Holmes, published an article in the Wall Street Jounal, which he stated, "The action, which will begin as a pilot program involving 24 banks in 15 markets -- including the New York metropolitan region -- will encourage those banks to extend home mortgages to individuals whose credit is generally not good enough to qualify for conventional loans. Fannie Mae officials say they hope to make it a nationwide program by next spring. Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits." (you also can go to wickipedia.com and they acknowledge this as well). "In addition, banks, thrift institutions and mortgage companies have been pressing Fannie Mae to help them make more loans to so-called subprime borrowers. These borrowers whose incomes, credit ratings and savings are not good enough to qualify for conventional loans, can only get loans from finance companies that charge much higher interest rates -- anywhere from three to four percentage points higher than conventional loans." Holmes went on to say that one study indicates that "18 percent of the loans in the subprime market went to black borrowers, compared to 5 per cent of loans in the conventional loan market." Now that obviously is not too much of a problem during any economic boom, but may "run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in the 1980's," said Holmes. He goes on to say that "Fannie Mae officials stress that the new mortgages will be extended to all potential borrowers who can qualify for a mortgage. But they add that the move is intended in part to increase the number of minority and low income home owners who tend to have worse credit ratings than non-Hispanic whites." As a result, hispanic applicants jumped by 87.2 per cent from 1993 to 1998, and blacks, who got mortgages increased by 71.9 percent. In July of 1999, the Department of Housing and Urban Development proposed that by the year 2001, 50 percent of Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's portfolio be made up of loans to low and moderate-income borrowers. Last year, 44 percent of the loans Fannie Mae purchased were from these groups. And of course, another main reason there is such a push to obviously, the blame game. Back in 1999, the policy change came when HUD began investigating allegations of so called "racial discrimination" in the automated underwriting systems used by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to determine the credit-worthiness of credit applicants. To read the complete article by Holmes, click below. But there you have it, now it's 2008, and we are in the financial crisis that we are in, in part, because of the reckless and irrisponsible actions of these lenders that basically was another "give away" program to non-whites. Until then.


Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Illegal immigrant supporters protest federal raid

According to the OneNewsNow, "Mississippi-based immigration reform activist says it's absurd that a group of illegal immigration supporters are staging a protest against recent federal immigration raids aimed at enforcing the rule of law. On August 25, federal agents conducted a raid at the Howard Industries transformer plant in Laurel, Mississippi, where nearly 600 illegal aliens were detained, and some processed for removal from the U.S. The raid was the largest of its kind in U.S. history and created uproar among the pro-illegal alien advocates, who are staging a Sunday protest during a Hispanic festival in the Gulf Coast city of Biloxi. Organizers claim the protest is part of a nationwide movement to take a stand in favor of "humane immigration reform," but Dr. Rodney Hunt of the Mississippi Federation for Immigration Reform and Enforcement believes what they want is amnesty. "It's disingenuous to talk about immigration reform," Hunt contends. "True immigration reform, I think, is making sure our laws are a benefit to United States citizens -- and amnesty is a not a benefit to our citizens." Hunt adds that Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents are protecting the rights of American citizens and legal residents when they conduct these raids. "It's against the law in the United States to have employment if you're not legally qualified to be employed here," he explains. "You have to have a legal work visa to have employment in the United States." According to Hunt, the pro-illegal alien rally will ultimately fail. "A couple of years ago when they had the mass rallies demanding amnesty, I think it rallied the American citizens against the idea of amnesty," he says. "It brought it to the forefront, and it reminded them that these people came here illegally. It reminded them that they were not here to assimilate into our culture." However, what we as Americans have to remember is that with the election coming up, which candidate is going to enforce the rule of law? Which candidate is going to ensure that our children do not live in a country where non whites are running rampant because our elected officials didn't stop the massive flood of illegal immigrants? Unfortantely, Barack Obama and Insane McCain is not going to stop illegal immigration. Both candidates are in favor of more immigrants. In fact, Insane McCain was in favor of amnesty of millions of illegal immigrants a while back. Do we honestly think that as President, he would put our troops on our borders to stop the illegal immigrants from coming into this country. Of course not. And what about Barack Obama. Well, I think the answer is pretty clear as well. He is a liberal socialist that would only encourage and open our borders even more, where more illegal immigrants and legal immigrants from third world countries would enter into our country. We are at a pivotal point in American history in which our country is going to be non-white by 2042 (a conservative figure). Our white children will be living in a country in which it looks like Mexico, Africa, or some other third world country. However, as White Christians, we have a duty to pray for our country, and continue to spread the White Christian Revival of White Nationalism. Until then.

Saturday, September 27, 2008

Judeo-Christians support adoptions of non-whites

It seems as the traditional church continues to accept Judaism, the church will also accept its anti-Christian teaching. The Bible tells us to be aware of the false teachings of the Pharisees. Unfortunately, with Judaism now being promoted by so-called Christians, generations are being raised with the belief that race-mixing is accepted by the Bible and if you do not believe in race-mixing and integration, then you are an evil racist that is not a Christian. One of these false teachings of the Pharisees ( an old name for Rabbis), is that we as Judeo-Christians should adopt children from other races. They say that God encourages adoptions and they will use verses in the Bible that gives references to adoptions without realizing that adoption was not about adopting children of other races. American Family Association is one of those groups that says a lot of things that traditional Christians believes. However, it is the teaching of race-mixing and their support of whites adopting non-whites that is so incidious. Everytime whites adopt non-whites not only does it destroy the teaching of keeping your race pure and have racial pride, but it gives the seal of approval for other family members to start adopting other non-white children, and unfortunately, to date and marry out side of their race. Below is an article from AFA. It appears to go be good and wholesome, and you get a warm fuzzy feeling in your stomach, but don't be fool. Once your race is destroyed, it is destroyed forever.

Like Father, like son WHY ADOPTION IS BECOMING A GOSPEL MOVEMENT
By Rebecca Grace - AFA Journal, October 2008

Maridel Sandberg is almost 50 years old. She is a wife, the mother of eight children, ages 5 to 27, and a grandmother of three. She has children and grandchildren the same age. She’s been potty training for 24 years, and this is the first time in 27 years that she has no children at home during the school year. Why? Because she and her husband adopted. Not because they couldn’t have children, for they have three they birthed. Not because they wanted to do a good deed, for life can be full of empty works. The Sandbergs, a Caucasian family, adopted five African-American children because they realized something amazing about adoption. “The deepest and strongest foundation of adoption is located not in the act of humans adopting humans, but in God adopting humans,” said Pastor John Piper, in an article titled “Adoption: The Heart of the Gospel” at http://www.desiringgod.org/. “And this act,” he continued, “is not part of His ordinary providence in the world; it is at the heart of the Gospel. Galatians 4:4-5 is as central a Gospel statement as there is: ‘But when the fullness of time had come, God sent forth His Son, born of woman, born under the law, to redeem those who were under the law, so that we might receive adoption as sons.’” “There are so many scriptures [Romans 8, Galatians 4, Ephesians 1] that inform our horizontal (human) expression of God’s love through adoption as an outflow of the Gospel,” said Jordan Thomas, pastor-teacher of Grace Church in Memphis, Tennessee (http://www.gracechurchmemphis.com/). “To make the understatement of the ages, we did not choose to be adopted by God. He chose us. He loved us with an everlasting love in Jesus,” Thomas explained. “And every Christian longs to see others know God’s adopting love. “Evangelism is a necessary outflow of a true relationship with Christ,” he added. “We feel that adoption is one of the strongest pictures of the love of God and is also one of the most conducive imaginable environments for evangelism (with your own children).” The Sandbergs couldn’t agree more. “I think the biggest wow moment was when we received our first son, Joshua,” Sandberg recalled. “It was like God came down from heaven and said, ‘This is how I have chosen you. And this is how I have called you by name, and you are mine. As much as Joshua is yours, you are mine.’ “It became the heartbeat of our lives that this is a reflection of God,” she said.

Loving Sandberg is director of The MICAH Fund (Minority Infant Child Adoption Help, http://www.micahfund.org/), at Bethlehem Baptist Church in Minneapolis, Minnesota, where Piper is pastor. Sandberg is also president of the Christian Alliance for Orphans. According to its Web site, http://www.christianalliancefor/orphans.org, the alliance “is a group of Christian organizations and churches that are joining voices to make caring for every orphan a reality. … The goal … is to inform, educate and engage churches and individuals in orphan and adoption ministry. “Our goal and our purpose is to proclaim with one voice the crisis and the needs around the world of 143 million orphans,” Sandberg explained. “Then the other arm of our organization is to provide Christians with lists of approved agencies that are dedicated to our vision, which is that every orphan would know Jesus as Savior and experience God’s unfailing love. “[After all], is there any better evangelism in all of creation than to raise up children who love Jesus and know Him well?” she asked. To meet both the physical and spiritual needs of orphans, the organizations that make up the alliance have laid down their logos and egos to work together toward a common goal. Still somewhat new, the alliance has gained about 85 organizational memberships since its official launch in November 2007 and hopes to add at least 1,000 churches that are working toward a church-based orphan, adoption or foster-care ministry. The alliance also has individual members and media partners. “I strongly believe that this alliance is the most profound, most strategic thing on the face of the earth that will reach the 143 million orphans of the world,” said Ed Schwartz, president of Loving Shepherd Ministries (http://www.loving-shepherd.com/), a member of the alliance. “The most beautiful thing about this is to watch individual organizations wrestle through what it looks like to love well,” Sandberg said. “My dream is that at some point we would be a unified force and be so effective … that the world would take note and … say, ‘Wow, look at how well they are caring. It must be God!’”

Reflecting In order to care truly for the fatherless, it is imperative to grasp the magnitude of the present orphan crisis while coming to grips with a right understanding of God. “Because we’re not close to the actual crisis, it doesn’t seem to touch us,” Sandberg explained. “[But in reality] the crisis is beyond anything that we could ever begin to put our hands around by ourselves.” Think about it this way: If the 143 million orphans in the world stood shoulder-to-shoulder, they would wrap around the 10,913-mile perimeter of the U.S. nearly four times. And if that number is still too hard to comprehend, consider adding the number of people who live in the 50 largest U.S. cities plus the entire populations of Ireland, Nicaragua, and Norway, plus all the people from Denmark and Costa Rica plus the entire population of Greece plus the people who live in France to equal 143 million. “We need to be ‘gloriously ruined’ by this crisis,” said Sandberg, quoting Kay Warren of the HIV/AIDS Initiative at Saddleback Church in California. “We’re going to need every Christian, anywhere in the world, to fulfill their part in God’s plan for how He is going to use us in caring and living out the Gospel.” But living out the Gospel through orphan care and mobilizing churches and individuals to action involves more than just recognizing the problem. Before people can live out the Gospel, they must understand the Gospel. “We don’t understand our God, and we don’t understand who He is and what He does for us,” she said. “We [must] … feel the weight of the reality that we were the most unlovable, least-likely creatures to ever be considered for adoption … by anyone, especially God! But in sheer mercy, He has set His love on us, and at great cost to Himself – the death of His only begotten Son,” Thomas explained. So the more a person understands his spiritual adoption and experiences the amazing love of God in his own life, the more natural it is for him to give himself away to care for others. “A large number of Christians – at some point in their journey – consider adopting, but they don’t know where to go or who to trust in that process,” Sandberg said. “I always say to them: ‘Of course you would consider adopting. You’re just like your Father because He adopted you. If you’re a child of God, naturally you would want to reflect Him.’” Encountering the Father and becoming a true reflection of His glory is what it’s all about for His children.

Obeying “[I]f only 7% of the world’s professing two billion Christians would adopt, there would effectively be no more orphanages,” Thomas quoted from Shaohannah’s Hope (http://www.shaohannahshope.org/), an orphan-care ministry established by Christian music artist Steven Curtis Chapman. However, both Thomas and Sandberg are quick to clarify that not every Christian is called to adopt. But every Christian is called to care for “the least of these.” “Adoption isn’t ministry,” Sandberg said. “Adoption is choosing to parent and choosing to love and calling a child my own, as God calls me His own. “So if you’re looking for a ministry, you shouldn’t adopt,” she added. “You should … care for orphans … [in some way].” Caring comes in many forms, such as financial assistance, supplying humanitarian aid to orphanages, visiting orphans and meeting their physical and emotional needs or starting a church ministry to create awareness and spur action. Regardless, the need is great. The call is real, and the ways are many. For Grace Church, a plant of Bethlehem Baptist but not a member of the alliance, caring comes in the form of the AMBER Adoption Fund (Adoption Magnifies the Beauty of Eternal Redemption). Thomas said the fund “is an effort of Grace Church to encourage Christian families to pursue adoption, and to seek to assist qualifying families with the sometimes burdening financial responsibilities involved.” The fund is named in memory of Amber Mathenia, a young adoptive mother and friend of the church who died in a car accident in early 2008. The church’s prayer is that every child adopted through the fund will come to know Christ. “The fund was established … through the leadership of elders who led the church to a partnership with The ABBA Fund (http://www.abbafund.org/),” Thomas explained. “The ABBA Fund services many different expressions of adoption funding, one of which is that churches are able to set up private adoption funds through ABBA.” Thomas said it seems only natural that churches would be advocates for adoption. Sandberg added, “I think the mere fact that the ministry [of orphan care] and the movement [of adoption] are growing is, in and of itself, a glorious thing to be a part of.”

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Canadian physicians attack Unborn Victims of Crime bill

According to OneNewsNow.com, "The Canadian Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (SOG) has issued a statement that accuses the drafters of the Unborn Victims of Crime bill with conspiring to remove the "right" of a woman to kill her child at will by abortion up to the end of natural gestation, as Canadian law currently allows.

The SOG wrote, "This Bill proposes to amend the Criminal Code to allow for a foetus to have legal standing, while in utero, so that a charge can be brought after its miscarriage against a person who deliberately or recklessly assaults a pregnant woman carrying that foetus while committing a crime."

"This Bill can only be interpreted as giving the fetus in utero legal status at conception. That would fundamentally change current Canadian law."

The Canadian medical community, as represented by the various medical professional associations, have long been in full support of the radical feminist pro-abortion agenda. The position of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists is identical to that issued by the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada.

Joyce Arthur, one of Canada's foremost abortion activists, wrote last month, "The only reason to prefer Bill C-484 is to recognize the fetus itself as a victim, but this makes the fetus a separate legal person, in direct conflict with the rights of the pregnant woman. The problem of establishing legal personhood for the fetus, and its vast potential for harm to women, has already been discussed in our previous statements against Bill C-484."

Pro-life advocates have repeatedly pointed out that the bill is "pro-choice," and not a pro-life piece of legislation. Introduced in November 2007 by Conservative party MP Ken Epp, the bill allows for the fetus to be protected only if a pregnant woman wanted to bring the child to term.

In late August, Mr. Epp said, "I know the critics of C-484 will continue to spread misinformation. But I continue to hope that thoughtful, everyday Canadians, not influenced by political agendas or strident ideology, will continue to support C-484 - and about 70 percent of Canadians do, including the vast majority of women across the country."

"Either that child matters so that attacks on pregnant women are more heinous, in which case Bill C-484 is a direct recognition of that reality; or that child doesn't matter, in which case we don't need any new law - the current provisions in the Criminal Code already cover the violence against the woman," said Epp.

In late August, Mr. Epp announced he would not be scrapping his bill, despite an announcement by Justice Minister Rob Nicholson that the Conservative government will introduce similar legislation, a decision criticized as an obvious attempt to sink Epp's Bill C-484.

"I definitely will not be withdrawing my bill. They're quite different. I don't intend to let up," he said. He encouraged concerned Canadians to continue contacting their MPs in support of C-484."

Monday, September 8, 2008

McDonald's pays 56 employees to attend sodomite meeting

The McDonald's corporation continues to support the homosexual agenda. In fact, McDonald's this year paid 56 employees to attend meeting promoting this perverse and unChristian lifestyle. As some of you are aware, The Knights Party has joined with the American Family Asosciation to boycott McDonald's. I received an email from the AFA in which they are asking to (1) Sign the online Boycott McDonald’s petition.• Forward this to family and friends and ask them to sign the petition. (2)• Print and distribute the Boycott McDonald’s petition.• VERY IMPORTANT! Call your local McDonald’s. Speak with the manager. Tell him or her (in a polite manner) that you will be boycotting McDonald’s until they stop promoting the homosexual agenda, including homosexual marriage. To find the phone number of your nearest McDonald’s, click here. • For more information on the McDonald's boycott, click here.
As reported by the AFA, "In January, McDonald’s paid for travel and accommodations for 56 employees to attend the “Pioneer Summit” in San Diego. The purpose of the meeting was to develop a plan to promote the gay agenda within the company. Those attending were thrilled that McDonald’s showed such support for their agenda."
“It was truly inspiring to see McDonald’s Lesbian, Gay, Bi-Sexual and Transgender members come together to share heartfelt, personal stories about their journeys, challenges and personal reflections. Better understanding these journeys … will help us better grow our people in the restaurants and across the company,” said Brian Unger, senior vice president."
"AFA has asked McDonald’s to remain neutral in the culture battle – to neither oppose nor support the gay agenda. McDonald’s has refused, choosing to support those groups and individuals promoting the gay agenda — including homosexual marriage. A McDonald’s official (Bill Whitman) went so far as to say that those who oppose the gay agenda are motivated by hate." Next time you are at McDonald's, just think that your money is going to support the lifestyle and the agenda of the sodomite movement. When you see Ronald McDonald around children, you may want to keep an eye on him. Until then.

Saturday, September 6, 2008

California Supreme Court rules against religious freedom.

Well, the California Supreme Court has done it again. It has gone against religious freedom. The same California Supreme Court that recently legalized same-sex marriage, has ruled by a 7-0 vote that homosexual rights trump religious freedom. The ruling barred doctors, because of their Christian beliefs, from withholding unnecessary medical care to gays and lesbians (sodomites). The ruling says that under state law sexual orientation rights trump religious freedom. Justice Joyce Kennard wrote in the ruling that two Christian fertility doctors who refused to artificially inseminate a lesbian have neither a free speech right nor a religious exemption from the state's law, which "imposes on business establishments certain antidiscrimination obligations."Doctors at the Christian clinic referred the lesbian to another clinic, but the lesbian refused their referral - demanding that the Christian clinic perform the procedure. When the Christian doctors refused to violate their religious convictions, the lesbian sued and the Supreme Court gave her the victory.

This ruling will again have a devasting affect on every business in California. If a similar victory in a federal court is won, every business in America will be affected. According to the American Family Association, "Alabama Fertility Specialists (AFS) has begun a campaign to bring Honda of Alabama to its knees because Honda will not cover artificial insemination for a lesbian in it’s insurance. Honda advised their insurance carrier to "exclude domestic partners (same-sex partners) from ART (Assisted Reproductive Technology) benefits including diagnostic services related to fertility/infertility..." If this doesn't work, then count on AFS to sue. Alabama Fertility Specialists alerted the media, their supporters and sodomite groups about Honda’s actions and called on supporters and sodomites to bombard Honda with phone calls and letters."


Many American still live under the illusion that American citizens are free to run their business as they see fit. Yes, one time, American citizens were free to do that. Under the old U.S. Constitution, this was so. However, with what is commonly called the new U.S. Constitution (stating 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments specifically being applied to the states), the states have lost for their most part their soverignty (this is what makes up federalism-the separation between the state governments and the federal governments). Now, even though this was the California Supreme Court's decision, and not a federal court decision, we have liberal judges in state supreme courts that have bought into the idea that citizens are no longer able to run their business as they see fit, which comes down to, you can't practice your faith in the open arena. Until then.


Thursday, September 4, 2008

Hurricane Gustav causes sodomite conference to cancel

Many Stories, One Voice conference, slated for Sept. 4–7 in New Orleans, canceled due to Hurricane Gustav. Many Stories, One Voice: The North American Convocation of Sodomites that is masked under the so called Pro-LGBT Christians, scheduled for Sept. 4–7 in New Orleans, La., has been canceled due to Hurricane Gustav. It appears that God just couldn't stomach the thought of sodomites pretending to be Christians. Praise God for Hurricane Gustav.

Sunday, August 24, 2008

Jason Robb in MSN Report

A while back, the Associated Press contacted me regarding my thoughts on how the racialist movement would react if Barack Obama became President of the United States. Their story was whether the white nationalist movement would increase and be more mobalized. They interviewed others such as David Duke, former Louisiana State Legislature, and former national director of the Knights of the Ku KLux Klan. In the report, the Associated Press wrote, "Jason Robb, a Harrison, Ark., attorney who represents the Klan's Knights Party, describes himself as a "white nationalist." "It doesn't really matter if Obama wins the election or McCain wins the election," Robb said in an interview. "Neither of them are going to try to fight to preserve the white race or heritage." Robb said, however, that Obama's election could prompt more whites to get involved in politics by distributing pamphlets or writing letters to editors." You can read the full story by clicking on the link. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26087413/

Monday, August 18, 2008

USA Communist Party "endorsing" Barack Obama-what do you expect

The editorial, titled "Eye on the Prize," was published in the group's official newspaper The editorial, titled "Eye on the Prize," was published in the group's official newspaper The People's Weekly World. According to the editorial, "A broad multiclass, multiracial movement is converging around Obama's 'Hope, change and unity' campaign because they see in it the thrilling opportunity to end 30 years of ultra-right rule and move the nation forward with a progressive movement." The editorial ended by saying "One thing is clear. None of the people's struggles -- from peace, to universal healthcare, to an economy that puts Main Street before Wall Street -- will advance if McCain wins in November. Let's keep our eyes on the prize." Of course, I'm no fan of Insain McCain, but it shows that you are known by the friends you keep and those who supports you. It's no wonder that the USA Communist Party is pushing and hoping that Barack Obama will become President of the United States since Barack Obama will do exactly what the Communist Party wants-the economy being controlled by the government, a mandatory healthcare program, the continual push of racemixing, abortion, and the homosexual movement, and the continual destruction of the U.S. Constitution by appointing far left liberal judges that will insert their own views of what the Constitution should say instead of strictly applying the Constitution. If Barack Obama becomes President, maybe he won't be standing infront of the United States flag, but the old U.S.S.R. flag. Until then.









Friday, August 15, 2008

Germans retain custody of children because of homeschooling

Another German home-schooling family is under attack. Home schooling is illegal in Germany. According to OneNewsNow.com, "in January, police raided a family's home (the Gorbers) and took custody of six of their children. Mike Donnelly, an attorney with the Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA), says the parents have had a hearing during which the court ruled the children must remain in state custody. The picture on the right are supporters of the Gorbers that came to the family court hearing. 'The judge did order a psychological evaluation of the parents, which is pretty standard in these kinds of cases,' he explains. 'It seems like the German courts think that anybody who would want to home school their children is crazy.' The Gorbers regained custody of their three-year-old son following the court session and were granted increased visitation rights for some of the other children. The HSLDA attorney notes that the court apparently paid no attention to one factor in the case. "The key is this," Donnelly adds. "All the children have already had psychological evaluations, and the children's psychological evaluations came back fine -- so there's the fruit. You can judge the tree by its fruit." The parents will have a post-evaluation court date, but Donnelly does not expect the hearing will favor the parents. HSLDA notes that Germany has Europe's highest incidence of removing children from their homes. Statistics indicate the removal of children from their homes was up 12.5 percent this year in Germany while the number of abused children remained the same." The ultra liberals, one-worlders in many countries including the United States do not like the fact that parents believe it is their God given right to raise their children. They instead believe it is the state's responsibility to raise the children, to teach the children values, and morals; not the parents. And if parents want to raise their own children when their own values and morals, then it is because they are psychologically disturbed. Pray for this famill and all families in Germany that are standing up for this abuse. Until then.

Thursday, August 14, 2008

White Americans no longer majority by 2042

In 2006, non-Whites made up less than half of the population in about 10 percent of U.S. counties, a Census report found. Now, just released from Washington, the Associated Press published that White people will no longer make up a majority of Americans by 2042, according to new government projections. That's eight years sooner than previous estimates, made in 2004. "The nation has been growing more diverse for decades, but the process has sped up through immigration and higher birth rates among minority residents, especially Hispanics. It is also growing older.
The white population is older and very much centered around the aging baby boomers who are well past their high fertility years," said William Frey, a demographer at the Brookings Institution, a Washington think tank. "The future of America is epitomized by the young people today. They are basically the melting pot we are going to see in the future."
The Census Bureau Thursday released population projections through 2050, based on rates for births, deaths and immigration. They are subject to big revisions, depending on immigration policy, cultural changes and natural or manmade disasters. The U.S. has nearly 305 million people today. The population is projected to hit 400 million in 2039 and 439 million in 2050.
That's like adding all the people from France and Britain, said Steve A. Camarota, director of research at the Center for Immigration Studies, a Washington group that advocates tighter immigration policies.
White non-Hispanics make up about two-thirds of the population, but only 55 percent of those younger than 5. By 2050, whites will make up 46 percent of the population and blacks will make up 15 percent, a relatively small increase from today. Hispanics, who make up about 15 percent of the population today, will account for 30 percent in 2050, according to the new projections.
Asians, which make up about 5 percent of the population, are projected to increase to 9 percent by 2050. The population 85 and older is projected to more than triple by 2050, to 19 million." Now, we hear about how great diversity is. We hear it is so wonderful that millions of non whites are flooding into our country and how it is changing to reflect that flood. Well, it is not that great. The days of Andy Griffith in Mayberry will no longer be the norm. Our culture will change, our cities have already changed, our public schools will change (and already are changing- that is why homeschooling is booming), our outlook of history will change (Martin Luther King is taught to be a good man, when he was a member of over 70 Communist organizations, his file from the FBI has been sealed, he had numerous extramarital affairs, he helped destroy the White European culture and bring one of integration), our government will change to one of a Republic to one that is an oligarchy. Immigration definitely is not and will not be good for our country. With Whites being the minority, we will see the passing of a great Country to one that will reflect a third world country (just look at any major American city such as Destroit, and you will see the cities don't reflect our White European culture, but a culture of Negroes, Asians, and Mexicans., where you can't walk safely down the streets, the cities are virtually bankrupt, and people are fleeing the cities. It's not because of the crime, it is because of the racial makeup of the cities. And the worse of it all is, our White Children will be suffering. Pray for God's deliverance. Until then.

Sunday, August 10, 2008

Home schooling constitutional in California

A great victory occurred in California which surprised homeschoolers and their supporters. And now, home schoolers in California and their supporters are celebrating a legal decision in which the court handing down the ruling actually reversed itself. According to Onenewsnow, "Earlier today (Friday) the California Court of Appeal ruled that the state's education code allows parents to home school their children. That decision means parents do not have to obtain state credentials in order to home school. The court acknowledged that a state prohibition on home schooling would intrude on parents' constitutional right to direct their children's education, and that that any limit on that right would be presumed unconstitutional. Gary McCaleb, senior counsel with the Alliance Defense Fund, is pleased that the court decided parents have a constitutional right to make educational choices for their children. 'Thousands of California families have educated their children through home schooling,' he states. '[This decision] protects the rights of families and protects an avenue of education that has proven to benefit children time and time again.'"
As has been reported on this blog, in early March a three-judge panel of the California Court of Appeal determined that parents in the Golden State had no legal right to homeschool, a ruling that would have caused parents and even students to be criminal sanctioned if they continued to have been homsechooled.
Mike Farris, chairman of the Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA), says today's ruling was unexpected. "We're very thrilled, not just a little bit, [and] we're surprised as well," he remarks. "To get a court to do a 180-degree reversal is a remarkable thing and we view it as a blessing from God. We're really thankful for it, and there's hundreds of thousands of home-school kids in California who are now able to breathe a sigh of relief." Farris says groups like the Alliance Defense Fund, Liberty Counsel, HSLDA, and Focus on the Family teamed up and were armed with new information that compelled the court to uphold parents' constitutional right to educate their children at home.
There is no doubt that this is a tremendous victory for not only the children and their parents in California, but for homeschoolers nationwide. As we see our public schools being destroyed with the propaganda that is being pumped in by the left wingers and homosexuals, our children are no longer being taught the basic Western Christian ideas and values that our country was built upon. They are being taught about my two dads, that our White European culture is something to be ashamed of, and that Martin Luther King, Jr. was a wonderful man instead of the truth of him being a member of over 70 communist organizations, an unfaithful man to his wife, and a black agitator that helped destroy our white culture. We as White Nationalists, and those living in California should be praising our heavenly Father of this victory in California. Those that are interested in homeschooling and a website that not only can help you about homeschooling, but teaches from a white European viewpoint, should go to http://www.whitepridehomeschool.com/. to read the decision from the California Court of Appeals, which the decision in In re: Rachel L. issued by the California Court of Appeal is available at www.telladf.org/UserDocs/RachelDecision.pdf. The court reheard the case on June 23 (www.telladf.org/news/story.aspx?cid=4566).

Tuesday, July 29, 2008

McDonald's sponsor San Francisco Homosexual parade

McDonald’s helped sponsor the San Francisco Gay Pride Parade. Want to see what McDonald’s considers worthy of support? Click here. (Warning: These photos are extremely offensive and graphic.) Currently the American Family Association has a boycott against McDonald's as a result of their support of homosexual causes. The AFA asked McDonald’s to remain neutral in the culture war. The company refused, stating they will continue to support the gay agenda including same-sex marriage. McDonald’s spokesman Bill Whitman told the Washington Post that those (even Christians) who oppose homosexual marriage are motivated by hate, saying that "... hatred has no place in our culture." The main reason that AFA has a boycott against McDonald's is because it is fully supporting the homosexual agenda. The picture on the right was taken at a protest last year of a McDonald's restaurant in California as a result of their support of the San Francisco homosexual parade.
To help promote the gay agenda, McDonald’s paid $20,000 to become an official "organizational ally and corporate partner" of the National Gay and Lesbian Chamber of Commerce and secure a seat on the group’s board of directors. The NGLCC lobbies against laws protecting marriage as between a man and a woman. Has McDonald's helped support Christian groups? Of course not. It seems that major corporations are bending over backwards in trying to seek the support of homosexual and other extreme left wing groups. It appears they are afraid that if the don't, then they will be called racists, bigots, or any other evil word that they can think of. Corporations such as McDonald's and Ford Motor Co. do not really care about our Christian culture and heritage. They don't care about the culture or future that our children are going to grow up in. Whenever you crave a bigmac, or some other hamburger at McDonald's, just think that the corporation is actively trying to destroy our Christian culture. Don't support them. Until then.

Monday, July 28, 2008

PBS airing program claiming Bible is not true

According to the American Family Association, "The Public Broadcasting System (PBS), probably the most liberal network in America, will present a program this fall that says the Old Testament is a bunch of made-up stories that never happened. 'The Bible's Buried Secrets' says the Bible is not true. It is scheduled to air on November 18.
Producer Paula Apsell said: "...It's (The Bible's Buried Secrets) designed for intelligent people who are willing to change their mind. …it will give intelligent people who want to read the Bible in a modern way a chance. If we insist on reading the Bible literally, in 25 years, nobody will read it any longer."
Among highlights of "The Bible's Buried Secrets":
• The Old Testament was written in the sixth century BC and hundreds of authors contributed. • Abraham, Sarah and their offspring didn't exist. • There is no archaeological evidence of the Exodus. • Monotheism was a process that took hundreds of years. • The Israelites were actually Canaanites. • The Israelites believed that God had a wife."
So why is PBS receiving our tax dollars? Your guess is better than mine. "The Bible's Buried Secrets" is simply one more reason Congress should stop supporting PBS with our tax dollars. Congress gives PBS hundreds of millions of tax dollars to help support the network. Of course, many in Congress would most likely claim that PBS is a public network, owing no allegience to any specific group or idea. However, PBS is often known for its left wing leaning programs. And this is just one more example. America was built upon Christianity; our laws, institutions, and founding fathers all believed that America was only built for Christians and that Christians should govern. However, we as a people have allowed those that hate our heritage and faith to rule over us and to allow programs and other forms of media to put out trash that literally calls into question our belief and literally calls our Holy Bible a lie. We as Christians should protest shows such as the PBS airing, write letters, make phone calls and fax our opposition to these media outlet. Remember, God said "His word would not return void." It will serve a purpose, eventhough we may think it is insignificant. Be silent no more.

Sunday, July 27, 2008

U.S. House vote to repeal HIV travel ban

On July 25, the U.S. House voted to repeal the HIV travel ban. The Senate voted July 16 to repeal the prohibition, which was codified by Congress in 1993. While immigration law currently excludes foreigners with any “communicable disease of public health significance” from entering the country, only HIV is explicitly named in the statute. Now it comes to President Bush. What will he do? Will he protect the citizens of the United States or will he be pressured into signing the bill repealing the ban? With the increasing power of the homosexual movement, our laws which is put into place to protect our citizens are now being removed as a result of the powerful homosexual lobbyists. If this is signed by President Bush, we will primarily see only foreigners from overwhelmingly non white countries coming into this country that carries the deadly disease. Most Americans are not aware that Whites are practically immune from it. Yes, whites can get it, but statistically, it is very low. But if they are heterosexuals and do not have sex with non whites, and basically are just plain White Christian folks, they have nothing to worry about. Yet statistically, blacks get aids at an alarming rate, and aids are now increasing even more with Mexicans. We pray that President George Bush will do the right thing and not sign the bill, but will instead be steadfast, and hold his ground, and not cave into the left wing extremists. Our children are too important. Until then.

Monday, July 21, 2008

Pass the SAVE Act.

Today's teenage employment levels are the lowest in U.S. history. Because Congress has refused to pass the SAVE Act, millions of American teenagers are unable to get jobs this summer due to their being filled with illegal foreign workers. Unless the illegal alien population is seriously addressed this disturbing trend will only get worse. What many Americans don't fully realize is that we not only have problems with millions of illegal aliens pouring into our country, we have legal immigrants pouring into our country from third world countries at the same alarming rate. As a result, this drives our wages down, and prevents our citizens from fully rising to their capacity. But the most important element, is that these are from non-European countries that do not share our same values, culture, and heritage. Our White Christian children will not be growing up in a country that looked like the 50s, but will instead be growing up in a country that looks like Africa, Mexico, or some other third world country. If you don't believe me, look at any major city in the U.S., (in fact did you know that Detroit now does not have one grocery store or theatre because of the high Black crime,mmmm in the entire city) and see how safe the city looks and whether it reflects a White community. Contact your Congressman to pass the SAVE Act now. Until then.

Monday, July 14, 2008

Barack Obama welcomes guests at the annual White Pride Convention - Just Kidding

I thought that would grab your attention. It's almost funny to think that Barack Obama would actually attend and seek support or enourage Whites at any White Nationalist meeting. Well, why not, he received a prideful welcome from the annual NAACP convention Monday night, and just recently spoke at the National Conference of La Raza (which means the Race), which is the national Mexican group that is attempting to break the Western states from the United States and reclaim it for Mexico, and an organization that doesn't want any border security on our Souther states, which ultimately will change America into a non-White country, which will soon look like a third world country. Insain McCain as well spoke at La Raza and is planning to speak at the NAACP convention this coming Wednesday. It seems that both of these Senators are actively trying to seek support from Mexicans, Negroes, Homosexuals, Chinese, Vietnamese, Indians, Mongs, eskimos, aboriginese, ect. Hopefully, I haven't left any group out. Oh, what about the Whites? They are no big deal. As you can tell, I'm hoping to show the irony here that they are trying to seek support from every group imaginable except the whites. You don't see these senators speaking at the Knights Party Convention, Council of Conservative Citizens, the EuroConference with David Duke and Don Black. Why? Because they don't care about the unique and precious culture of White-Europeans. They don't care if it is destroyed. If they did, they would be making statements about it. Either way, Whites lose in November on election day. Until then.

Thursday, July 10, 2008

Supreme Court rules child rapists can't be executed.

As many of you may not be aware, the U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled in Kennedy v. Louisiana that child rapists cannot be executed. The ruling stemmed from the case of Patrick Kennedy, who appealed the 2003 death sentence he received in Louisiana after being convicted of raping his 8-year-old stepdaughter. Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion that execution in this case would violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment, citing "evolving standards of decency" in the United States. Such standards, the justice wrote, forbid capital punishment for any crime against an individual other than murder. "We conclude that, in determining whether the death penalty is excessive, there is a distinction between intentional first-degree murder on the one hand and nonhomicide crimes against individual persons, even including child rape, on the other," wrote Kennedy. Patrick Kennedy, 43, would have been the first convicted rapist in the United States since 1964 to be executed in a case in which the victim was not killed. Kennedy was convicted of sexually assaulting his stepdaughter in her bed. The attack caused severe emotional trauma, internal injuries and bleeding to the child, requiring extensive surgery, Louisiana prosecutors said. This is devastating to know that our children are not protected from rapists that prey on our children. This again shows the moral standards being continually lowered. The Holy Bible specifically calls for the death penalty for rapists of any kind, and the majority of states up until 1964 allowed execution for this type of crime. However, the 60s is when the U.S. Supreme Court started moving away from Christian based decisions. But some in Congress are attempting to take action. House Republican Whip Roy Blunt (R-Missouri) is so outraged by the United States Supreme Court's decision in the Kennedy v. Louisiana child-rape case that he has drafted a letter to the Supreme Court Justices asking them to withdraw the current opinion and reconsider the case. Please call your Representatives today at 202-225-3121 and ask them to add their voices to the issue. The courts should never consider "evolving standards of decency" in a brutal rape case. I recently received an email from another attorney on this and have posted it here.

----------------------------


Dear Jason. I recently ran across your blog . I, like you, am an attorney, a family man, and a believer in Jesus Christ. I have my own law practice in St.Louis County, Missouri. Although I expected the Supreme Court's ruling in Kennedy v. Louisiana, I was deeply saddened and grieved at the Court's ruling which protects the vilest of criminals. The Court's reference to evolving standards of decency would be laughable if it weren't so perverse and alarming. I see nothing decent in making this country safe for pedophiles. These justices are products of a deluded 20th Century educational system that taught them God doesn't exist, that demonic influences don't exist, and that people on the inside are all essentially identical blank slates who will all act the same if they are just provided the same education. They were taught that the key to eliminating bad behavior, including murder and rape is simply education. They couldn't be more wrong. God does exist, demonic influences do exist, and people are vastly different from each other and will act very differently when exposed to the same educational and other environmental influences. I believe that Kennedy v. Louisiana needs to be cried out against over and over again as an example of the depravity of the decision makers in this country. Hopefully, the political right won't let this miscarriage of justice be forgotten. I hope you will use your forum to cry out against the gross miscarriage of justice that is the Court's ruling in Kennedy vs.Louisiana, God Bless you and your family. Please keep speaking out against evil, it will not be in vain. Yours very truly, Frank L.


Wednesday, July 9, 2008

Denver Mayor will host Homosexual conference.

According to the Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Taskforce, "The Colorado Host Committee for the 21st National Conference on LGBT Equality: Creating Change, recently hosted a Denver-area fundraiser to kick off the host committee’s work to roll out the rainbow carpet of welcome to all attendees at the upcoming Creating Change Conference. Mayor John Hickenlooper, Denver’s pro-LGBT leader, regaled the crowd and announced his full support for the conference, which will be held Jan. 28–Feb. 1, 2009, in Denver. The event raised $1,800 for the host committee’s scholarship fund to make the movement’s most unique annual skills and strategy conference accessible to youth attendees from Colorado. Special thanks to Chris Meza and Brian Jacobson who opened their home for the event." The photo on the right is: Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper, host committee co-chairs Hope Wisneski and Gus Spheeris, Task Force Movement Building Director Russell Roybal and host committee co-chair Anthony Aragon. Continued, "Each year the conference is held in a different region of the United States and attracts 2,500+ participants from within and outside of the LGBT community." So parents living in Colorado and specifically within Denver, hold your children tight to you if you are driving by this conference since homosexuals will be out full force. These homosexuals will be eyeing your children. There will no doubt individuals that attend these conferences will be members of the Man/Boy Club that actively promotes men having sexual relationships with boys. What is more disturbing is the fact that a prominent mayor is actively promoting this conference. He definitely is no friend to White Christians that want a Christian European society and a country that reflects the long standing tradition of a European culture. Would the mayor ever publically announce an endorsement for a conference being held in Denver that promotes White Christians. Of course not. Politicians today will now actively seek the endorsement from the perverted lifestyle of homosexuals rather than the Christian family. Until then.