President-Elect Obama seeks "spiritual" guidance from openly homosexual bishop

As I've been reporting lately, President-elect Barack Obama is definitely going to bring change to this country, but it will be a change that we won't recognize. One of those changes is Barack Obama's strong belief that sodomites should have equal rights in our government, schools, and even churches. There is no doubt that Obama will be pushing for a "new" civil rights legislation that will prevent discrimation based upon sexual orientation, which means you wouldn't be able to discriminate against homosexuals. If you didn't want to sell your home to a homosexual, you would be in violation of federal law. If a local Christian school or church didn't want to hire a Sunday school teacher because she was a lesbian, then that church or school would be in violation of federal law and would be sued. See, the implication is far reaching. Now some may say that this is an exageration. Well, they did this with the 1964 Civil Rights law that outlawed discrimination based upon race. Now, it's the homosexuals turn up to the plate. The Times of London reports that Barack Obama sought out New Hampshire homosexual bishop Vicki Gene Robinson for advice three times during his presidential campaign. Robinson, whose ordination in the Episcopal Church has caused a deep rift within the Anglican Communion, was reportedly sought out by Obama to discuss what it feels like to be "first." Robinson notes in their three private conversations, Obama voiced his support for "equal civil rights" for homosexuals and described the election as a "religious experience." Peter LaBarbera, president of Americans for Truth About Homosexuality, believes "Obama's consultations with Robinson show the true tenor of his upcoming administration. "It looks like Billy Graham has been replaced by a gay bishop. We're moving to, perhaps, our first anti-Christian president; it's beyond post-Christian. Gene Robinson advocates homosexuality as part of the Christian experience," he explains. "Now Bible-believing Christians cannot accept that. Homosexual practice is sinful, as taught by the scriptures. This man [Obama] pretends to be faithful to Christianity, even as he works very hard to undermine it." LaBarbera suggests Robinson may possibly replace Jeremiah Wright as one of Obama's main spiritual advisers. Wright was Obama's Chicago pastor for 20 years before disassociating with the controversial preacher during the presidential campaign." Change is coming, so hold on. Until then.

Cross-dressers in White House with Obama?

A change is coming to America, and it is a scary one. What will the White House look like under an Obama administration? Well, it may look similar to that of San Francisco during the annual Sodomite parade. According to OneNewsNow.com, there is alarm over president-elect Barack Obama's plan to expand a Clinton-era executive order that provides special protections for federal employees based on their sexual behavior. "The Obama-Biden transition team has included both "sexual orientation" and "gender identity" in its non-discrimination policy for applicants for employment in the incoming Obama administration." Apparently, as the two homosexuals depict to the right, you may see a scene similar to this when you take your chilren to the White House or U.S. Capitol. Or perhaps, you may see Vice-President elect Joe Biden pushing Barack Obama in a shopping cart at the White House on your next tour since they are pushing this agenda so much (umm, I wonder why). Anyway, President Bush, trying to appease the Sodomite crowd did not overturn Bill Clinton's executive order prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. Yet, the Clinton order does not address so-called gender identity. Word of Obama's planned executive order has excited his allies on the left. Christopher Anders, senior legislative counsel with the American Civil Liberties Union, says "president-elect Obama and vice president-elect Biden, by explicitly rejecting the bigotry and intolerance of the past, are committing that gay, lesbian, and transgender professionals can serve in government without fear of discrimination." Peter LaBarbera, president of Americans for Truth About Homosexuality, says Obama's new non-discrimination policy will be an "open door" for gender-confused and cross-dressing federal employees. "What's the Obama administration going to do to protect women in federal restrooms?" the activist asks. "Since men [wearing] dresses apparently are going to be protected under gender-identity provisions, what about the women in the restrooms in the White House and other federal buildings? What's going to be done to protect their rights?" LaBarbera even wonders if there is going to have to be a new federal outlay for the building of new "gender-free, transgender restrooms." The president-elect has been a supporter of a version of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) that offers special protections for transgender employees. All of this is an attempt to further the so called civil-rights protections of Sodomites, and eventually lead to legislation that specifically protects homosexuals, and prohibits discrimination based on being a homosexual or "gender confused." Unfortantely, millions of whites voted for Barack Obama without realizing that the change they voted for is not going to be in the best interest of our dearly beloved America, or their children. A change is coming, and perhaps it's Obama wearing a dress. Until then.

Marxist Obama becomes First Black President

Today, I'm in mourning. To wake up and realize that we have elected not only the first black President, but a Marxist President saddens my heart. For the majority of White Americans, we truly, perhaps, won't feel the true effect. But our children will feel the pain and burden that we as a country have given them. That being said, these so called Christians, what we would called Judeo Christians, such as Focus on on the Family, American Family Association,and others that have abandoned the traditional Christian values and beliefs in that they have supported millions of non-white immigration into our country, and race-mixing, which have caused our country to become almost non-white. And we see today what that has done. We have just now witnessed a virtual race war in that vast majority of the non-whites have voted overwhelmingly for Barack Obama and the whites voted for Insane McCain. The reward for the betrayal of our people is Marxist Obama. May God have mercy upon our nation. Until then.

Tomorrow is the Big Day.

There is no doubt that tomorrow will be an election that will see significant change for our country. Either way, White Christians will lose. Either we will have for the first time a black President that does not share thebeliefs of our founding forefathers or we will have a white McAmnesty that will help ensure that millions of illegal aliens will become citizens that will only bring a quicker destruction to our country. But we will most likely see a quicker left wing, socialist, marxist agenda with a President Obama. For example, President Obama could overturn marriage amendment. According to OneNewsNow.com, a 'President Obama' could overturn marriage amendments California, Arizona, and Florida have constitutional amendments on the ballot to ban homosexual "marriage." Liberty Counsel examines the Florida amendment as well as the repercussions of the federal election. Mat Staver of Liberty Counsel tells OneNewsNow the stakes are high in Florida because passage of a constitutional amendment requires 60 percent of the vote. "Right now the polls show about 57 percent in favor of the amendment. The good news is only 34 percent oppose the amendment," he explains. "There is an undecided factor in there. I believe that factor will swing for us when they go to the polls." However, he also points out the national election could affect all states in terms of homosexual marriage. If elected president, Barack Obama has promised to repeal the federal Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, which currently means states cannot be forced to recognize homosexual marriages that are legal in other states. "Now if that happens, that will be like removing the dam and same-sex marriage will flood across the country, notwithstanding the fact that a state even has a constitutional amendment," he contends. "A state will be required to recognize either Massachusetts or California or some other state's same-sex marriage law. That means same-sex marriage will literally rush across the borders of all 50 states." We our losing our country at such an alarming rate, and the alarming thing is how quickly it has occurred. We as Christians need to remember that our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ is in complete control. We have to be steadfast and remain faithful and be witnesses to our White brothers and sisters and proclaim the message of White Christian Revival. Until then.

Sodomite high school in Chicago?

A sodomite high school coming to a neighborhood near you. That's right, according to OneNewsNow.com, "A battleground is forming in Chicago over a proposed "gay" (editor's note, sodomite)-friendly high school for homosexual, lesbian, and transgendered students, or any other students who want to attend. According to reports, taxpayer money would be used to fund the school.

One News Now.com continues, "The school would be called the Pride Campus of Social Justice High School, and plans are under way to possibly open its doors in 2010. Advocates of the school say it is needed in order to combat the bullying, dropout, and depression rate among homosexual students. The Chicago Sun-Times quotes a member of the school's design team who says students at the school would be taught about "gay and lesbian historical figures" so those students "have heroes." Editors' note. Unfortunately, sodomites anymore claim many historical figures were "gay" in order to justify their sick and perverse lifestyle. For example, they will make absurd claims that Abraham Lincoln, Alexander the Great, and former F.B.I Director Hoover

One News Now.com continues, "Laurie Higgins and her group, the Illinois Family Institute, are at the forefront of the fray. "A high school that is dedicated to or centrally focused on homosexuality necessarily requires that public educators have come to some prior conclusions about the nature and morality of homosexuality," she points out. Those are aspects of homosexuality that she says stand "far outside the purview of public educators." (hear audio report) Pro-family advocate Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth About Homosexuality [Caution: This website contains graphic images] takes issue with the fact that the school would be run on taxpayer monies. "The taxpayers -- whether they're Christians, Orthodox Jews, Muslims -- they will be funding [this] pro-homosexual indoctrination school for so-called 'gay' youth," he explains. Higgins agrees that public funding for the school would be inappropriate (and clearly Unconstitutional). And as for the rationale for the school being needed to combat bullying of homosexual students, she believes rules of conduct should be established and enforced on an equal basis. "The task is to combat harassment and abuse and bullying, while not affirming disordered thinking and immoral behavior," she explains. And while she acknowledges that some homosexual students are bullied, Higgins' experience in public education reveals another group that she feels suffers more. "I can say with assurance that the kids who are very conservative Christians are probably the ones who are the most ridiculed or made fun of," (and of course, white Christians who stands up for their white culture and heritage) she states. Chicago Public Schools is soliciting public input for a vote. LaBarbera and Higgins both encourage concerned Chicago parents to petition that the school not be allowed to open." Of course, maybe it wouldn't be a bad idea to have sodomites not being in the same classes with straight students. Until then.

LaRaza requesting Sheriff Steve Bizzell to resign.

LaRaza, the racist Mexican organization is requesting that Johnston County Sheriff Steve Bizzell of North Carolina resign because of statements about Mexicans. In a recent article in Raleigh's The News & Observer, Johnston County Sheriff Steve Bizzell was quoted accusing Latinos of "breeding like rabbits," calling Mexicans "trashy," and stating, "When people think about illegal Mexicans, you know the first thing they think of? Driving drunk and shooting. Sheriff Bizzell is saying what many Americans are saying out of frustration. Time and time again, Americans are angry and fed up that our elected leaders are not doing anything, especially our President. President Bush should be sending troops to our borders in order to protect our country and citizens. We have an invasion that literally thousands are crossing our borders a day, and our so called elected officials just look the other way because they don't want to offend Mexicans or other so called minority groups because then they would be called racists and bigots. There are however, people in this country such as Sheriff Bizzell that obviously is just tired of Mexicans getting off scott free and not being rounded up and sent back to their countries. Now as a result, a coalition of minority extremist groups in North Carolina has asked that the Johnston County commissioners push for Bizzell's resignation. Now, if a black sheriff or a Mexican sheriff had made statements that were anti-white, would there be an outcry by these same people requesting and demanding that particular sheriff resign. Of course not. Fortunately, however, what they fail to realize is a sheriff position is an elected official. In fact, it is really the only legal law enforcement official since the people vote for their sheriff. He is not appointed by a mayor or some other official. Therefore, I pray that Sheriff Bizzell will stand firm, and not cave into the non-white extremists. Until then.

Giving loans to non-whites caused financial crisis.

It has just been reported that the federal government has just signed a bill for 700 billion dollars to bail out lenders such as Fannie Mae. Most Americans are upset that this has happened and in fact, majority of the callers to the Capitol switchboard was against bailing out these lenders that are controlled by Jewish Supremacists CEOs. But the real question is why are we in this mess in the first place? The easy answer is that the we have an unconstitional banking system that is dictating our money policy, which is called the Federal Reserve. The Constitional specifically states that U.S. Congress is to control and regulate our financial policy and to print and regulate our money. However, the Federal Reserve, a private bank now prints and loans money out to the United States, in which we then have to pay back with interest. But to the question at hand, why are these financial lenders collapsing? The media will not shed light on the answer, and the political leaders will not discuss it, but the reason these lenders are collapsing is that Fannie Mae ( the headquarters is on the right), just to name one, announced back in 1999 that they were changing their policy and ease the credit requirements on loans which would increase home ownership rates among minorities. Steven A. Holmes, published an article in the Wall Street Jounal, which he stated, "The action, which will begin as a pilot program involving 24 banks in 15 markets -- including the New York metropolitan region -- will encourage those banks to extend home mortgages to individuals whose credit is generally not good enough to qualify for conventional loans. Fannie Mae officials say they hope to make it a nationwide program by next spring. Fannie Mae, the nation's biggest underwriter of home mortgages, has been under increasing pressure from the Clinton Administration to expand mortgage loans among low and moderate income people and felt pressure from stock holders to maintain its phenomenal growth in profits." (you also can go to wickipedia.com and they acknowledge this as well). "In addition, banks, thrift institutions and mortgage companies have been pressing Fannie Mae to help them make more loans to so-called subprime borrowers. These borrowers whose incomes, credit ratings and savings are not good enough to qualify for conventional loans, can only get loans from finance companies that charge much higher interest rates -- anywhere from three to four percentage points higher than conventional loans." Holmes went on to say that one study indicates that "18 percent of the loans in the subprime market went to black borrowers, compared to 5 per cent of loans in the conventional loan market." Now that obviously is not too much of a problem during any economic boom, but may "run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in the 1980's," said Holmes. He goes on to say that "Fannie Mae officials stress that the new mortgages will be extended to all potential borrowers who can qualify for a mortgage. But they add that the move is intended in part to increase the number of minority and low income home owners who tend to have worse credit ratings than non-Hispanic whites." As a result, hispanic applicants jumped by 87.2 per cent from 1993 to 1998, and blacks, who got mortgages increased by 71.9 percent. In July of 1999, the Department of Housing and Urban Development proposed that by the year 2001, 50 percent of Fannie Mae's and Freddie Mac's portfolio be made up of loans to low and moderate-income borrowers. Last year, 44 percent of the loans Fannie Mae purchased were from these groups. And of course, another main reason there is such a push to obviously, the blame game. Back in 1999, the policy change came when HUD began investigating allegations of so called "racial discrimination" in the automated underwriting systems used by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to determine the credit-worthiness of credit applicants. To read the complete article by Holmes, click below. But there you have it, now it's 2008, and we are in the financial crisis that we are in, in part, because of the reckless and irrisponsible actions of these lenders that basically was another "give away" program to non-whites. Until then.

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0DE7DB153EF933A0575AC0A96F958260&sec=&spon=&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink