McDonald's sponsor San Francisco Homosexual parade

McDonald’s helped sponsor the San Francisco Gay Pride Parade. Want to see what McDonald’s considers worthy of support? Click here. (Warning: These photos are extremely offensive and graphic.) Currently the American Family Association has a boycott against McDonald's as a result of their support of homosexual causes. The AFA asked McDonald’s to remain neutral in the culture war. The company refused, stating they will continue to support the gay agenda including same-sex marriage. McDonald’s spokesman Bill Whitman told the Washington Post that those (even Christians) who oppose homosexual marriage are motivated by hate, saying that "... hatred has no place in our culture." The main reason that AFA has a boycott against McDonald's is because it is fully supporting the homosexual agenda. The picture on the right was taken at a protest last year of a McDonald's restaurant in California as a result of their support of the San Francisco homosexual parade.
To help promote the gay agenda, McDonald’s paid $20,000 to become an official "organizational ally and corporate partner" of the National Gay and Lesbian Chamber of Commerce and secure a seat on the group’s board of directors. The NGLCC lobbies against laws protecting marriage as between a man and a woman. Has McDonald's helped support Christian groups? Of course not. It seems that major corporations are bending over backwards in trying to seek the support of homosexual and other extreme left wing groups. It appears they are afraid that if the don't, then they will be called racists, bigots, or any other evil word that they can think of. Corporations such as McDonald's and Ford Motor Co. do not really care about our Christian culture and heritage. They don't care about the culture or future that our children are going to grow up in. Whenever you crave a bigmac, or some other hamburger at McDonald's, just think that the corporation is actively trying to destroy our Christian culture. Don't support them. Until then.

PBS airing program claiming Bible is not true

According to the American Family Association, "The Public Broadcasting System (PBS), probably the most liberal network in America, will present a program this fall that says the Old Testament is a bunch of made-up stories that never happened. 'The Bible's Buried Secrets' says the Bible is not true. It is scheduled to air on November 18.
Producer Paula Apsell said: "...It's (The Bible's Buried Secrets) designed for intelligent people who are willing to change their mind. …it will give intelligent people who want to read the Bible in a modern way a chance. If we insist on reading the Bible literally, in 25 years, nobody will read it any longer."
Among highlights of "The Bible's Buried Secrets":
• The Old Testament was written in the sixth century BC and hundreds of authors contributed. • Abraham, Sarah and their offspring didn't exist. • There is no archaeological evidence of the Exodus. • Monotheism was a process that took hundreds of years. • The Israelites were actually Canaanites. • The Israelites believed that God had a wife."
So why is PBS receiving our tax dollars? Your guess is better than mine. "The Bible's Buried Secrets" is simply one more reason Congress should stop supporting PBS with our tax dollars. Congress gives PBS hundreds of millions of tax dollars to help support the network. Of course, many in Congress would most likely claim that PBS is a public network, owing no allegience to any specific group or idea. However, PBS is often known for its left wing leaning programs. And this is just one more example. America was built upon Christianity; our laws, institutions, and founding fathers all believed that America was only built for Christians and that Christians should govern. However, we as a people have allowed those that hate our heritage and faith to rule over us and to allow programs and other forms of media to put out trash that literally calls into question our belief and literally calls our Holy Bible a lie. We as Christians should protest shows such as the PBS airing, write letters, make phone calls and fax our opposition to these media outlet. Remember, God said "His word would not return void." It will serve a purpose, eventhough we may think it is insignificant. Be silent no more.

U.S. House vote to repeal HIV travel ban

On July 25, the U.S. House voted to repeal the HIV travel ban. The Senate voted July 16 to repeal the prohibition, which was codified by Congress in 1993. While immigration law currently excludes foreigners with any “communicable disease of public health significance” from entering the country, only HIV is explicitly named in the statute. Now it comes to President Bush. What will he do? Will he protect the citizens of the United States or will he be pressured into signing the bill repealing the ban? With the increasing power of the homosexual movement, our laws which is put into place to protect our citizens are now being removed as a result of the powerful homosexual lobbyists. If this is signed by President Bush, we will primarily see only foreigners from overwhelmingly non white countries coming into this country that carries the deadly disease. Most Americans are not aware that Whites are practically immune from it. Yes, whites can get it, but statistically, it is very low. But if they are heterosexuals and do not have sex with non whites, and basically are just plain White Christian folks, they have nothing to worry about. Yet statistically, blacks get aids at an alarming rate, and aids are now increasing even more with Mexicans. We pray that President George Bush will do the right thing and not sign the bill, but will instead be steadfast, and hold his ground, and not cave into the left wing extremists. Our children are too important. Until then.

Pass the SAVE Act.

Today's teenage employment levels are the lowest in U.S. history. Because Congress has refused to pass the SAVE Act, millions of American teenagers are unable to get jobs this summer due to their being filled with illegal foreign workers. Unless the illegal alien population is seriously addressed this disturbing trend will only get worse. What many Americans don't fully realize is that we not only have problems with millions of illegal aliens pouring into our country, we have legal immigrants pouring into our country from third world countries at the same alarming rate. As a result, this drives our wages down, and prevents our citizens from fully rising to their capacity. But the most important element, is that these are from non-European countries that do not share our same values, culture, and heritage. Our White Christian children will not be growing up in a country that looked like the 50s, but will instead be growing up in a country that looks like Africa, Mexico, or some other third world country. If you don't believe me, look at any major city in the U.S., (in fact did you know that Detroit now does not have one grocery store or theatre because of the high Black crime,mmmm in the entire city) and see how safe the city looks and whether it reflects a White community. Contact your Congressman to pass the SAVE Act now. Until then.

Barack Obama welcomes guests at the annual White Pride Convention - Just Kidding

I thought that would grab your attention. It's almost funny to think that Barack Obama would actually attend and seek support or enourage Whites at any White Nationalist meeting. Well, why not, he received a prideful welcome from the annual NAACP convention Monday night, and just recently spoke at the National Conference of La Raza (which means the Race), which is the national Mexican group that is attempting to break the Western states from the United States and reclaim it for Mexico, and an organization that doesn't want any border security on our Souther states, which ultimately will change America into a non-White country, which will soon look like a third world country. Insain McCain as well spoke at La Raza and is planning to speak at the NAACP convention this coming Wednesday. It seems that both of these Senators are actively trying to seek support from Mexicans, Negroes, Homosexuals, Chinese, Vietnamese, Indians, Mongs, eskimos, aboriginese, ect. Hopefully, I haven't left any group out. Oh, what about the Whites? They are no big deal. As you can tell, I'm hoping to show the irony here that they are trying to seek support from every group imaginable except the whites. You don't see these senators speaking at the Knights Party Convention, Council of Conservative Citizens, the EuroConference with David Duke and Don Black. Why? Because they don't care about the unique and precious culture of White-Europeans. They don't care if it is destroyed. If they did, they would be making statements about it. Either way, Whites lose in November on election day. Until then.

Supreme Court rules child rapists can't be executed.

As many of you may not be aware, the U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled in Kennedy v. Louisiana that child rapists cannot be executed. The ruling stemmed from the case of Patrick Kennedy, who appealed the 2003 death sentence he received in Louisiana after being convicted of raping his 8-year-old stepdaughter. Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion that execution in this case would violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment, citing "evolving standards of decency" in the United States. Such standards, the justice wrote, forbid capital punishment for any crime against an individual other than murder. "We conclude that, in determining whether the death penalty is excessive, there is a distinction between intentional first-degree murder on the one hand and nonhomicide crimes against individual persons, even including child rape, on the other," wrote Kennedy. Patrick Kennedy, 43, would have been the first convicted rapist in the United States since 1964 to be executed in a case in which the victim was not killed. Kennedy was convicted of sexually assaulting his stepdaughter in her bed. The attack caused severe emotional trauma, internal injuries and bleeding to the child, requiring extensive surgery, Louisiana prosecutors said. This is devastating to know that our children are not protected from rapists that prey on our children. This again shows the moral standards being continually lowered. The Holy Bible specifically calls for the death penalty for rapists of any kind, and the majority of states up until 1964 allowed execution for this type of crime. However, the 60s is when the U.S. Supreme Court started moving away from Christian based decisions. But some in Congress are attempting to take action. House Republican Whip Roy Blunt (R-Missouri) is so outraged by the United States Supreme Court's decision in the Kennedy v. Louisiana child-rape case that he has drafted a letter to the Supreme Court Justices asking them to withdraw the current opinion and reconsider the case. Please call your Representatives today at 202-225-3121 and ask them to add their voices to the issue. The courts should never consider "evolving standards of decency" in a brutal rape case. I recently received an email from another attorney on this and have posted it here.

----------------------------

Dear Jason. I recently ran across your blog . I, like you, am an attorney, a family man, and a believer in Jesus Christ. I have my own law practice in St.Louis County, Missouri. Although I expected the Supreme Court's ruling in Kennedy v. Louisiana, I was deeply saddened and grieved at the Court's ruling which protects the vilest of criminals. The Court's reference to evolving standards of decency would be laughable if it weren't so perverse and alarming. I see nothing decent in making this country safe for pedophiles. These justices are products of a deluded 20th Century educational system that taught them God doesn't exist, that demonic influences don't exist, and that people on the inside are all essentially identical blank slates who will all act the same if they are just provided the same education. They were taught that the key to eliminating bad behavior, including murder and rape is simply education. They couldn't be more wrong. God does exist, demonic influences do exist, and people are vastly different from each other and will act very differently when exposed to the same educational and other environmental influences. I believe that Kennedy v. Louisiana needs to be cried out against over and over again as an example of the depravity of the decision makers in this country. Hopefully, the political right won't let this miscarriage of justice be forgotten. I hope you will use your forum to cry out against the gross miscarriage of justice that is the Court's ruling in Kennedy vs.Louisiana, God Bless you and your family. Please keep speaking out against evil, it will not be in vain. Yours very truly, Frank L.

Denver Mayor will host Homosexual conference.

According to the Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Taskforce, "The Colorado Host Committee for the 21st National Conference on LGBT Equality: Creating Change, recently hosted a Denver-area fundraiser to kick off the host committee’s work to roll out the rainbow carpet of welcome to all attendees at the upcoming Creating Change Conference. Mayor John Hickenlooper, Denver’s pro-LGBT leader, regaled the crowd and announced his full support for the conference, which will be held Jan. 28–Feb. 1, 2009, in Denver. The event raised $1,800 for the host committee’s scholarship fund to make the movement’s most unique annual skills and strategy conference accessible to youth attendees from Colorado. Special thanks to Chris Meza and Brian Jacobson who opened their home for the event." The photo on the right is: Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper, host committee co-chairs Hope Wisneski and Gus Spheeris, Task Force Movement Building Director Russell Roybal and host committee co-chair Anthony Aragon. Continued, "Each year the conference is held in a different region of the United States and attracts 2,500+ participants from within and outside of the LGBT community." So parents living in Colorado and specifically within Denver, hold your children tight to you if you are driving by this conference since homosexuals will be out full force. These homosexuals will be eyeing your children. There will no doubt individuals that attend these conferences will be members of the Man/Boy Club that actively promotes men having sexual relationships with boys. What is more disturbing is the fact that a prominent mayor is actively promoting this conference. He definitely is no friend to White Christians that want a Christian European society and a country that reflects the long standing tradition of a European culture. Would the mayor ever publically announce an endorsement for a conference being held in Denver that promotes White Christians. Of course not. Politicians today will now actively seek the endorsement from the perverted lifestyle of homosexuals rather than the Christian family. Until then.

House of Representatives holds First meeting ever on "transgender discrimination."

On June 26 , 2008, the U.S. House of Representatives held its first-ever hearing on "transgender discrimination" in the workplace. In addition the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force submitted written testimony documenting the urgent need for inclusion of gender identity in federal employment protection, in addition, the NGLT said, "the Action Fund has worked closely with the National Center for Transgender Equality (NCTE) to prepare for the hearing.
Several studies have shown widespread employment discrimination against transgender people, as documented in the Action Fund’s written testimony. Later this summer, the Task Force Policy Institute will be adding to the existing body of research with the launch of the largest-ever study of transgender people’s experiences of discrimination in their daily lives, including within the workplace." Statement by Rea Carey, Executive DirectorNational Gay and Lesbian Task Force Action Fund said, “Discrimination against transgender people is pervasive and current laws and employer policies are insufficient to protect their rights. For far too long, transgender people have lived with the fear of losing their job simply because of who they are. Today’s hearing marks a critical step in addressing this travesty once and for all. “We applaud the House Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and Pensions for holding today’s hearing, and we urge lawmakers to pass federal employment protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity.” However, the reason the homosexual groups are wanting laws prohibiting discrimination in the work place because they know that the vast majority of Americans believe the homosexual lifestyle is gross and perverted. The only reason laws are passed are to force individuals to do something that they normally would not do. Americans, as a whole, do not want to walk into businesses with their children and have to be face to face with overt homosexuals. And because of this, the homosexual groups want to eventually get Congress to pass laws prohibiting discrimination based on sexual identity. If this happens, then this again takes away a business owner to decide what is best for his company and who he hires and fires. Not only that, but our churches will once again be bowing down to the homosexual agenda same as they did with the so called civil rights acts in the 1960s. Unfortunately, you would not see a hearing on the discrimination of White Christians in the work force. You do not see a hearing on the thousands and thousands of attacks of White people every day by blacks and mexicans. You never will. We have only begun to see the evil that is being dripped into our communities and government. Until then.

U.S. Supreme Court upholds the 2nd Amendment.

What a wonderful case the U.S. Supreme Court ruled while I was on vacation. To hear this while I was flipping through the channels at the motel, made me smile greatly. If you didn't hear, the U.S. Supreme Court in DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al. v. HELLER, certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit No. 07-290, which was argued March 18, 2008--Decided June 26, 2008 held that individuals have a constitutional right to possess handguns while in their home for protection. The District of Columbia law bans handgun possession by making it a crime to carry an unregistered firearm and prohibiting the registration of handguns; provides separately that no person may carry an unlicensed handgun, but authorizes the police chief to issue 1-year licenses; and requires residents to keep lawfully owned firearms unloaded and dissembled or bound by a trigger lock or similar device. Respondent Heller, a D. C. special policeman, applied to register a handgun he wished to keep at home, but the District refused. He filed this suit seeking, on Second Amendment grounds, to enjoin the city from enforcing the bar on handgun registration, the licensing requirement insofar as it prohibits carrying an unlicensed firearm in the home, and the trigger-lock requirement insofar as it prohibits the use of functional firearms in the home. The District Court dismissed the suit, but the D. C. Circuit reversed, holding that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess firearms and that the city's total ban on handguns, as well as its requirement that firearms in the home be kept nonfunctional even when necessary for self-defense, violated that right.
Held:
1. The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Pp. 2-53.
(a) The Amendment's prefatory clause announces a purpose, but does not limit or expand the scope of the second part, the operative clause. The operative clause's text and history demonstrate that it connotes an individual right to keep and bear arms. Pp. 2-22.
(b) The prefatory clause comports with the Court's interpretation of the operative clause. The "militia" comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense. The Antifederalists feared that the Federal Government would disarm the people in order to disable this citizens' militia, enabling a politicized standing army or a select militia to rule. The response was to deny Congress power to abridge the ancient right of individuals to keep and bear arms, so that the ideal of a citizens' militia would be preserved. Pp. 22-28.
(c) The Court's interpretation is confirmed by analogous arms-bearing rights in state constitutions that preceded and immediately followed the Second Amendment. Pp. 28-30.
(d) The Second Amendment's drafting history, while of dubious interpretive worth, reveals three state Second Amendment proposals that unequivocally referred to an individual right to bear arms. Pp. 30-32.
(e) Interpretation of the Second Amendment by scholars, courts and legislators, from immediately after its ratification through the late 19th century also supports the Court's conclusion. Pp. 32-47.
(f) None of the Court's precedents forecloses the Court's interpretation. Neither United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U. S. 542, 553, nor Presser v. Illinois, 116 U. S. 252, 264-265, refutes the individual-rights interpretation. United States v. Miller, 307 U. S. 174, does not limit the right to keep and bear arms to militia purposes, but rather limits the type of weapon to which the right applies to those used by the militia, i.e., those in common use for lawful purposes. Pp. 47-54.
2. Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court's opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller's holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those "in common use at the time" finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. Pp. 54-56.
3. The handgun ban and the trigger-lock requirement (as applied to self-defense) violate the Second Amendment. The District's total ban on handgun possession in the home amounts to a prohibition on an entire class of "arms" that Americans overwhelmingly choose for the lawful purpose of self-defense. Under any of the standards of scrutiny the Court has applied to enumerated constitutional rights, this prohibition--in the place where the importance of the lawful defense of self, family, and property is most acute--would fail constitutional muster. Similarly, the requirement that any lawful firearm in the home be disassembled or bound by a trigger lock makes it impossible for citizens to use arms for the core lawful purpose of self-defense and is hence unconstitutional. Because Heller conceded at oral argument that the D. C. licensing law is permissible if it is not enforced arbitrarily and capriciously, the Court assumes that a license will satisfy his prayer for relief and does not address the licensing requirement. Assuming he is not disqualified from exercising Second Amendment rights, the District must permit Heller to register his handgun and must issue him a license to carry it in the home. Pp. 56-64.
478 F. 3d 370, affirmed.

to read the full case. click here. http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=000&invol=07-290